Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
courtneycouch0
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Your post made me notice an error on there. I was using our monthly cost and forgot to add in the reserved instance one time cost. Just added an edit to the post. We are big fans of Lua (corrected typo) and much of the load is set, zset and
32.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Basically it goes something like this (oversimplifying): hset('shard.healthcheck', checkId, token) wait 500ms on every slave hget('shard.healthcheck', checkId) Verify the tokens match. Slaves are removed from the pool when the tokens don't,
33.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
I agree that for most people a setup like this would not be cost effective. Our model only works at scale so it made sense to build for scale from the beginning. This kind of setup is likely cost prohibitive for most without some funding be
34.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
To be honest, we have not played with fsync every second. Redundant persistence servers across availability zones gives me enough comfort that my worry about losing that 60 seconds of data is rather low. I suspect we will play with this ov
35.
▲
Redis as the primary data store
(moot.it)
106 points
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
|
38 comments
36.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
If I could ask a quick favor from you: Can you create an account and try to post on our sandbox forum: http://moot.it/demos/forum.html We have quite a bit more logging there. The production system is not showing any errors. If you could
37.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Totally agreed. We were excited when you guys launched for the same reasons. Further validates the space! There simply needs to be more options, and it's great that there are people getting interested and creating products in this area.
38.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
I suspect it's a websocket upgrade issue that you must be having. Please email support@moot.it if you can with details! This is the first public availability for moot so it's not too unexpected to have a few bumps.
39.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Mr. Poole has no relation to this.
40.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Our demo forum is in a sandbox environment separate from our primary network and it's getting traffic and loading (at least based on our logs). The production system is still pushing median API response times of 1.608ms (a drop of 0.2 sinc
41.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
crumbling? median api response times are 1.446ms at the moment and basically all our servers are completely idle. Any issues would be new bugs for us to track down!
42.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Yes, you pick whether your comments are linear or threaded and you can mix and match (use threaded in some places, and linear in other places). It's configured simply by how you embed it.
43.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Sanitization and protection from attacks is handled by the API itself instead of the client. We feel it's inherently risky to rely on the client at all for any security.
44.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
http://betabeat.com/2012/11/4chan-founder-moot-sends-cease-d...
45.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
It is a legitimate request. Honestly we were quite surprised/baffled to receive it as well.
46.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Well considering we got the notice via overnight courier from his law firm (LEASON ELLIS) I think we can rule out /b/
47.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Seriously. kind of baffling that he even decided to try this!
48.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Infinite scrolling is actually not going to be there in the final production release.
49.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
That's funny. I never heard it was used in that way!
50.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
I've seen both of these. Pivory seems not really very mature/serious, and branch doesn't seem like a forum replacement. IMHO pivory is hideous (different strokes) and still feels too bound by trying to simply make old forums "cool". Seems
51.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
That's just temporary. We rushed out an early build of moot to coincide with the HTML5 Flowplayer release. The full moot release with dedicated moot demos is coming up eminently. I had the same thought as well actually.
52.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Stack Exchange is a break for the norm for sure. I guess I don't really consider it since it's not something you can setup on your site to power your own forums and commenting.
53.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
None of that is taking place. SSO and some deeper private discussion options will be available for paid customers. Those options are not relevant for the vast majority of people that would use moot though.
54.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Theres a link to a demo on the bottom to play with it.
55.
▲
by
courtneycouch0
14y ago
Seems no one has made any real serious attempt to really modernize them.