courseofaction

9 ms·

31.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Sounds like you don't have an argument or analogy and are going for ad hominem and deflection instead.
32.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Eat the rich, before they eat you.
33.
by courseofaction 2y ago
They are violating many, many laws. They should be named.
34.
by courseofaction 2y ago
The man lies about being good at video games. On twitter. The bar is very very low.
35.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Hilariously naive? Are you aware that fiction writers are usually demonstrating something about the real world? Have you ever read a thought experiment? Do you discount blueprints because they're not made from concrete and steel? Get o
36.
by courseofaction 2y ago
We archiving. Good time to reread A Canticle for Leibowitz
37.
by courseofaction 2y ago
And minimize ads served? Unlikely
38.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Who gives a hoot. OpenAI lies and steals and grifts and the sooner the responsibility for or control of any important tech is taken away from them the better.
39.
by courseofaction 2y ago
They have been appointed by the president who Zuckerberg stood beside at the inauguration of the age of grift. Legal specifics don't feel very relevant anymore.
40.
by courseofaction 2y ago
It is incredibly sad that the world's richest man was allowed to buy and trash a public square. Worse is coming. He cheats at video games, lies about it, and knee-jerk abuses his power over twitter to ban and personally attack people w
41.
by courseofaction 2y ago
You're really not going to enjoy history class when it comes to American empire
42.
by courseofaction 2y ago
80% being held by insiders and vesting during the presidency is wild.
43.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Is there a level of fidelity at which the animated character becomes an issue? Are we going to be seeing unreal engine powered photorealistic characters before this loophole is closed? Does the rights holder have to specify that the motion
44.
by courseofaction 2y ago
And Aaron Swartz is dead.
45.
by courseofaction 2y ago
The police should not be financially incentivized to enforce any aspect of the law, because it leads directly to corruption. CMV?
46.
by courseofaction 2y ago
If this is interpreted as torn jeans being disallowed, then fide has actually gone against the letter of its own code. That Carlsen will be able to point at this clause could embarrass them greatly, perhaps even legally?
47.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Teach a man to fish, and you can't charge him obscene amounts for fishing to be done for him.
48.
by courseofaction 2y ago
The climate is a chaotic system, not a seesaw.
49.
by courseofaction 2y ago
There is also a cost to future encoding of relevant information - I (roughly) recall an experiment with multiple rounds of lectures where participants took notes in a text document, and some were allowed to save the document while others we
50.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Is that the horseman we're giving up our rights for today?
51.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Likewise - a notification history feature would help, the confusion really cripples the real-time experience.
52.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Especially by a lack of sunlight. Fitting.
53.
by courseofaction 2y ago
It has been interesting to see the coordination of harris/waltz posts reaching top places in non-political reddits. There was also a marked increase in moderation at the beginning of the Ukraine war in related subreddits
54.
by courseofaction 2y ago
That was the plan. Destroy the public square. Destroy people's ability to communicate without corporate mediation. A (imperfectly) neutral conversational space became Elon's personal amplification platform overnight. He 'dere
55.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Awesome. Serves as a counter-example - would HN consider literacy to be damaging to the mind, or are we similarly mistaken by thinking that LLMs necessarily degrade the abilities of their users? Pre-writing 'texts' (such as the Il
56.
by courseofaction 2y ago
At risk of arguing with a psyop/bot: yes this does represent a significant shift as the last president literally did attempt a coup and the latest supreme court ruling has been passed in the context of that coup attempt and may give th
57.
by courseofaction 2y ago
Without making any claims about gender or non-binary people (not my wheelhouse, I simply don't know), there's ample evidence to suggest statistically significant population-level differences between males and females on a many cog
58.
by courseofaction 2y ago
That makes sense. Seems to open the door for fiat accompli nonetheless.
59.
by courseofaction 2y ago
I'm not sure I understand the meaningful distinction. In what sense can it be scrutinised? To what end can the court scritinise the act? Overturning the act itself? Can the court scrutinise the act and determine it illegal, but not hol
60.
by courseofaction 2y ago
You may have just seeded something

More ›