Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
count
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
80 ms
·
871.
▲
by
count
15y ago
There is no formal guidance (that I'm aware of) about revealing a secret, top secret, Q, or L clearances, nor is there formal guidance on revealing that you are SCI eligible. Each SCI compartment and SAP has its own unique rules about what
872.
▲
by
count
15y ago
DCI in general, and it depends on the specific SCI compartment.
873.
▲
by
count
15y ago
If you're going to run Riak on AWS, why not just use AWS S3 service, which is the Dynamo that Riak is based on?
874.
▲
by
count
15y ago
I had this idea a while ago, but never moved on it, as I figured out the whole 'its not actually legal in the US' part. I see Path is based in the UK, where it might be legal, but they've now started doing trials in the States. How would
875.
▲
by
count
15y ago
IRC and USENET never went away...
876.
▲
by
count
15y ago
What you call fundamentalism, I call 'rule of law'. Nobody cares about you doing 65 in a 55 either, until you either get pulled over or hit somebody. Then all of a sudden that 'understanding' becomes critical. We'll agree to disagree - en
877.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Don't confuse work ethic with motivation. I know a number of successful veterans who are kicking ass and making bank in civilian life. I also know a ton who are just 'retired' and enjoying their low-key life with friends and family. You c
878.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Lets not confuse an absence of evidence as an evidence of absence - just because there's no study yet that shows that 10 years in the USMC helps with work ethic, doesn't mean that 10 year in the USMC does NOT help with work ethic (unless yo
879.
▲
by
count
15y ago
I completely agree with you on the false advertising. That said, I think it's disingenuous to compare a residential network connection with a commercial telecom contract, as they provide fundamentally different things. The cross connect or
880.
▲
by
count
15y ago
It's way more than stateless autoconfig - privacy addresses and a host of other protocols assume the last /64 is a host address and flexible. What a horrible assumption to tack on though - it should have been codified in the v6 RFC if that'
881.
▲
by
count
15y ago
It's not unthinking fundamentalism, it's an understanding of the reality of the consumer internet market. What does a focal point have to do with this? There's no absence of information on either side, unless you just chose to ignore what
882.
▲
by
count
15y ago
If your ISP gives you a single address and requires you to pay for more equipment, and you 'hide' with NAT, you're violating your terms of service and contract with that ISP. Are you really suggesting that NAT66 be developed and deployed in
883.
▲
by
count
15y ago
How is NAT, which requires an intermediary (the NAT router/device) be configured and put in place in addition to the router, easier than IPv6 privacy addresses, where you just turn your computer on and let the router route?
884.
▲
by
count
15y ago
IPv6 privacy addresses are even more effective at this than NAT would be. Once the address is done being used, it goes away . You can still be tracked by your NAT'd address, as it will remain (relatively) static.
885.
▲
by
count
15y ago
A /64 is a 64-bit network mask on the 128bit ipv6 address, effectively leaving you with 64 bits for host addresses on that subnet. A /128 is a 128bit mask, leaving you with 0 extra bits (ie: a single host address). 2^(128-n) is the way it
886.
▲
by
count
15y ago
One of those can keep a starving man alive.
887.
▲
by
count
15y ago
This goes a very long way to helping, yes, but by itself does not guarantee anything. And not everything can be cfengined or puppeted.
888.
▲
by
count
15y ago
How do you know you can restore your system to a working state in the event of an unscheduled outage, cruft or not? You should discriminate between services and systems - make your service available 100% of the time, but you should be abl
889.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Just a nitpick, but OCSPs is not the plural of OCSP, and you don't 'download' it the way a CRL works. OCSP stands for 'Online' Certificate Status Protocol, and is a query/response protocol, that functions much like the DNS - you don't down
890.
▲
by
count
15y ago
How is this Hacker News?
891.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Improved micro is still self improvement :)
892.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Or maybe it's a friend or family member?
893.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Less dense implies colder, as the volume is not constant, but expanding. Temperature and density are different things though - one is how much energy something has, the other is how far away from other things it is. Related, but different
894.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Like the X-09? http://www.kaba-mas.com/a.php?page=x-09_main
895.
▲
by
count
15y ago
They're most up front about easy IPv6 connectivity. Many other places it's 'call and ask' or the like.
896.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Is he.net bad for just a colo'd rack, rather than VPSs?
897.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Silly semantic question - when you 'delete' your facebook account, do they use the word 'delete' or just 'disable' or 'shut off' or something similar? A friend of mine ragequit facebook a little less than a year ago, came back, and it allow
898.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Everything has overhead at scale. I think the 'HTTPS is hard on computers' stage has passed by though...its just not that computationally intensive on modern hardware.
899.
▲
by
count
15y ago
That's a good point, actually. Do we know for a fact if FB keeps the data available for use in their own algorithms/processes, even if they don't allow it's display?
900.
▲
by
count
15y ago
Actually, I have. Shredding, NIST, the whole nine. Facebook isn't protecting classified nuclear secrets, or the keys to the financial kingdom, it's protecting pictures of cats and drunk college parties. And outside of a few special places
More ›