corporealshift

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by corporealshift 4mo ago

   i don't understand why people would ever want to read this kind of article. The information is ok, but it's a regurgitation of many sources, some of it incorrect, covered in ai slop prose. Please share the cool thing you're d
2. 2.▲
   by corporealshift 5y ago

   I mean...if you read the github readme it literally describes what it does in the next line: "Uses CSS selectors to extract bits content from HTML files".
3. 3.▲
   by corporealshift 7y ago

   I build an RC (with the goal of making it autonomous) car. I got as far as giving it edge detection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-o8Uzi5o1k but haven't continued the project. It's a great platform for explori
4. 4.▲
   by corporealshift 12y ago

   I think there's a lot of value in balancing this approach with smaller sized tests, especially around complex code. The problem that the article doesn't address is if your test fails finding the failure point isn't as straigh
5. 5.▲
   by corporealshift 12y ago

   IANAL but ignore it
6. 6.▲
   by corporealshift 12y ago

   I like the approach to this article, and the demos it provided. I think there's a place for both, but I don't think that the "more" in the basement navigation is anywhere near as good as an actual menu. The problem is st
7. 7.▲
   by corporealshift 13y ago

   No ads if you sign in with twitter? Maybe that's the problem, since it's a search engine specifically for twitter... I'd be curious to see some information regarding the number of ad impressions/clicks too. The only ad o