corbulo

25 ms·

271.
by corbulo 4y ago
At this point I don't think the goal is to reach a state of 'secure'; it's shifting vulnerabilities around to be less predictable. Intentionally or not.
272.
by corbulo 4y ago
Well then I don't think this dialogue is gonna go anywhere. Agree to disagree.
273.
by corbulo 4y ago
Government-published economic statistics. They literally changed the definition of 'recession' for political convenience. You really think the economy is booming right now like whats being claimed? Every admin manipulates BLS coll
274.
by corbulo 4y ago
What about for specialized services that you may not already be aware of? The ideal of advertising is to inform and educate the consumer. Should non-megacorp specialized services simply not exist? How should they get the word out? The appro
275.
by corbulo 4y ago
Thats the national fed. The regional feds are privately owned by 'member banks' https://www.stlouisfed.org/in-plain-english/who-owns-the-fed... It's actually a really ambiguous topic to research, as owne
276.
by corbulo 4y ago
Not sure which is better. Ownership of regional feds is private. It's not like democracies take a long view of things very frequently, but neither does the fed, at least not directly (maybe through said regional ownership).
277.
by corbulo 4y ago
Are they managing it though? The books are cooked to all hell
278.
by corbulo 4y ago
I share your sentiment, but at the same time what channels should be used for marketing? Exclusively social media ads? Snail Mail? When I think about it on the flipside for small business marketing it's really a tragic scenario of wh
279.
by corbulo 4y ago
>Then find the answer yourself. I'm not qualified in the field of hazmat exposure. I do know there are experts in it, and it is extensively studied. The answer i'm looking for is bespoke to this particular situation. I don&#x27
280.
by corbulo 4y ago
You may be satisfied by tweets when it comes to government accountability but the point is, not that they should have, it's an explanation why not. Source what? Lmao you're the one making claims citing crap sources that you'r
281.
by corbulo 4y ago
>Sounds good to me. Not every happening in the country needs a dedicated slush fund. If officials determine that this does, FEMA has already been in close contact with the people who they need to be in close contact with. You want to be
282.
by corbulo 4y ago
Good catch. Still nuts, especially if you layer it with antidepressants. Some states were 107< per 100 for the opioids. How does that impact the movement of the Overton window over the last decade+ I wonder?
283.
by corbulo 4y ago
It used to be even worse. In 2012 the Opioid dispensing rate was 81 per 100 people. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/rxrate-maps/index.html This doesn't even include antidepressants/ssri and such.
284.
by corbulo 4y ago
Sam is about to settle the debate of whether the earths core is spinning
285.
by corbulo 4y ago
There have been like a dozen articles with this identical headline. What a petty central narrative. It sprung from a pretty innocuous issue. Who falls for this?
286.
by corbulo 4y ago
The invention of nukes changed the nature of sovereignty. It's not just a background tech that just exists. If your country doesn't have nukes it's looked at as 2nd class at best.
287.
by corbulo 4y ago
Why do you guys get so vitriolic? The parent is attempting to logically explain. What is the need for making intense moral characterizations? Don't you see the dichotomy here?
288.
by corbulo 4y ago
They being the local government. FEMA said on their own twitter. https://twitter.com/fema/status/1625617600104259584?s=20 Why has FEMA not been contacted for assistance? What went into the decision to burn it off?
289.
by corbulo 4y ago
I've seem that. Thats not news thats commentary, its a big distinction that not enough people are aware of. My sources are pretty broad. News is original reporting and going to the primary sources of a given story. Commentary sources u
290.
by corbulo 4y ago
Those people have a field day every time they take a shit
291.
by corbulo 4y ago
The National Media apparatus is not putting pressure on the right entities to ensure transparency and accountability. They have no problem doing that when it suits their political objectives. Wall to wall coverage of shit most people barely
292.
by corbulo 4y ago
Don't mistake media braintrust opinions for Americans opinions. Local environmental hazards like this have unanimous bipartisan support for being thorough and transparent, thats how we got legislation like the Clean Air Act. How grease
293.
by corbulo 4y ago
I can assure you that word choice is not arbitrary in a shitshow as large as this. Its PR Crisis management 101. Word choice means everything because it can be the difference in accountability. I guarantee you they are hoping for said effec
294.
by corbulo 4y ago
Is creation possible from a 2D semantic abacus? Is that how we want to define creation? If so, creation was already a non-human thing before LLMs by randomizing a dictionary enough times. Or do we tie creation to some kind of value? How sho
295.
by corbulo 4y ago
I mean nationalization. As the world economy fractures and countries take more control over their supply chains nationalization of industry will take place. China does it all the time. Russia is planning on doing it. The US is talking about
296.
by corbulo 4y ago
Nationalization of industry will likely rise with deglobalization, thats pretty risky for international banks.
297.
by corbulo 4y ago
My interpretation of what he said was 'shouldn't this be a bipartisan effort?!'
298.
by corbulo 4y ago
>If you bet on the scientific majority around climate change being wrong / non-existent / something we can't control, and end up being wrong, then the worst case scenario we make the planet uninhabitable (I'm going to
299.
by corbulo 4y ago
Has it been kept a secret? I think its more of a question of whether you believe whats out there or think there isn't sufficient explanation for what 'definitive' evidence there is (tic tac video for example).
300.
by corbulo 4y ago
People aren't afraid of the convenience. The 15 minute cities project comes with movement restrictions (in the name of climate) a la China in some areas like Oxford, I recall heated debate over that part.

More ›