copyright_sux

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by copyright_sux 9y ago

   As I already said, most people probably don't share your definition of initiating force and coercion. You provide no reason why those terms should be based only on private property. If you define initiation of force as "initiation
2. 2.▲
   by copyright_sux 9y ago

   I don't see why rules of human society should be based on a subset of behavior of animals, that you conviniently cherry-picked.
3. 3.▲
   by copyright_sux 9y ago

   The problem is most people probably don't agree with your definition of force and theft. I also don't know how you define the natural and why it should matter whether something is natural or not.
4. 4.▲
   by copyright_sux 9y ago

   Most people protect their body, because they have instinct for self-preservation, regardless of their beliefs about property. You presented no argument why we should treat natural resources or fruit of labor the same as human body. You just
5. 5.▲
   by copyright_sux 9y ago

   Of course full capitalism needs to be enforced. People using the resources they need happens naturally. Protecting private property requires initiation of force. Just Google issues of Libertarianism.