Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
copumpkin
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
copumpkin
4y ago
I don't think it's silly. Network effects are why Parler failed and Twitter succeeded (thus far at least!), or betamax failed, etc. These things don't succeed or fail for technical reasons, and develop into distinctly differe
2.
▲
by
copumpkin
4y ago
It's different in that nobody can control it. Everything since bitcoin has had some form of leadership, including Ethereum, that can reasonably consistently get the network to fork and cause things to happen. Bitcoin struggled for year
3.
▲
by
copumpkin
6y ago
Yeah, so that's why I was more hesitant about Deribit than I was about LedgerX. I have full faith in LedgerX the company and the regulator that oversees is. With Deribit you only really have a track record to go on, because if past per
4.
▲
by
copumpkin
6y ago
ledgerx.com is tightly regulated (all trades reported to CFTC) and physically settled with (in my opinion) very good security practices, but it's only available to US residents. Their longest expiry dates are December 2022, so about 2
5.
▲
by
copumpkin
6y ago
The market is more liquid than it ever has been. But yeah, not as liquid as I or many others would like. But if you really think it's gonna burst, there are plenty of eager sellers who would love to sell you some put options on LedgerX
6.
▲
by
copumpkin
6y ago
Get an account on there, get USD in somehow (either wire in funds the old-fashioned way or send in BTC and sell swaps/futures/options), and then you can sell puts at any strike/date that you want, as long as you have the USD
7.
▲
by
copumpkin
9y ago
cough
8.
▲
by
copumpkin
9y ago
After looking at it more carefully, I'm not positive that it's a failure to check privileges, although the symptoms at the time made it look like that (literally logging an unprivileged process killing a privileged one). Rather, I
9.
▲
by
copumpkin
10y ago
Some points & questions: 1. It's pretty easy to add iptables rules to 169.254.169.254 by uid and gid, achieving roughly the same restriction as file-based access. Not the case on Mac OS (although you can do something similar with p
10.
▲
by
copumpkin
10y ago
Yeah, all API actions will show up as being from ARN "arn:aws:sts::<account-id>:assumed-role/<hologram role>/<ldap username>"
11.
▲
by
copumpkin
16y ago
Two questions: 1) Will it be available on the Mac Appstore? :) 2) You mention that adding some bytes on the end is instant, and so is modifying bytes in the middle. It seems that for most filesystems (and definitely HFS+), it should be poss