coolcase

10 ms·

121.
by coolcase 1y ago
Incorrect usage for the first one (parens would be better). I think this is a carbon-based lifeform.
122.
by coolcase 1y ago
I see what you are saying. There is so much of this type of rhetoric online I sort of get blind to it sometimes. It's like pointing out a joke someone made, implying it wasn't a joke (you then have to imagine what airplane now mea
123.
by coolcase 1y ago
Downvoted! Should I have made something up?
124.
by coolcase 1y ago
Tried extracting data from a newspaper. It is really hard. What is a headline and which headline belongs to which paragraphs? Harder than you think! And chucking it as is into OpenAI was no good at all. Manually dealing with coordinates fro
125.
by coolcase 1y ago
Yeah Elons car will last forever in space, but probably won't start. Maybe it will.
126.
by coolcase 1y ago
Confluence for work. Personal space has a TIL and Personal notes on what I am working on. I leave them fully shared for Rovo and other staff to discover. Every thing else is Confluence in team spaces. And Jira. Slack too. Things can be har
127.
by coolcase 1y ago
Oh yeah. Don't do that! Look at all 500 tosses.
128.
by coolcase 1y ago
Experiment alot!
129.
by coolcase 1y ago
Me too. Seen mini versions of this at smaller companies.
130.
by coolcase 1y ago
It is misrepresentation, basically.
131.
by coolcase 1y ago
Fuck. That article gives me a real feel for working at Google and what it takes to succeed. It's a full time job to game the system!
132.
by coolcase 1y ago
So you end up with a higher threshold for confidence at p<0.05 ot whatever you want p to be under. Comes out in the maths! Toss a coin 10 times comes up heads 10 times. There is a 1 in 2^10 (approx 1000) that happens by chance for an unb
133.
by coolcase 1y ago
Yeah you are papermanning the comment, and that aint cool. Given the strength of the posted article (by Tracing Woodgrains) I cannot see the debate either. It is airtight. Non partisan. Nuanced. Stone uncovering. Dozens of references. Led t
134.
by coolcase 1y ago
Sounds like a variable cost experiment. Each observation cost x$. Like an A/B split on Google ads. Why keep paying for A when you know B is better already.
135.
by coolcase 1y ago
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a33957256/this-prog... Why sell a pee on a stick for $1 at 50c profit when you can sell one with a computer for $10 for $5 profit.
136.
by coolcase 1y ago
I think we are aware it is a closed system but doing the right thing is not rewarded. (Or wrong thing punished).
137.
by coolcase 1y ago
There is a lot of waste still. Pregnancy tests for example. And even the small array of devices - mouse keyboard phone watch charger headphones - still need to be replaced too often.
138.
by coolcase 1y ago
Yeah. I am very hygienic at work in terms of what sites I visit but you can never be too careful. To me the main threat vector is my dev curiosity!
139.
by coolcase 1y ago
Wishing SREs etc. good vibes
140.
by coolcase 1y ago
And at $Corp I get constant popups to enter my password or confirm an action. Like 50-100 a day.
141.
by coolcase 1y ago
I think that's it. Ad a layman I don't understand how the final transition (final hawking radiation) then tells the rest of the universe "I'm done" similar to a sprint retro!
142.
by coolcase 1y ago
It'll be 42'd like everything else
143.
by coolcase 1y ago
There is a theory out there that once heat death is done distance is meaningless, therefore zero, therefore big bang again.
144.
by coolcase 1y ago
The way to do that is to do the most unlikely things
145.
by coolcase 1y ago
Another 10^3 would be good for humanity
146.
by coolcase 1y ago
It can learn. Not in the same way as us though.
147.
by coolcase 1y ago
RL changes the weights which is a big deal. RL is expensive using HF. This could cut costs alot. You could have models learning different specialities. One could play with Redis and only do that for example.
148.
by coolcase 1y ago
I think that is the idea of play, for it to discover those abstractions from first principles. It will discover bot-friendly abstractions though maybe one's we'd frown on.
149.
by coolcase 1y ago
Still on codeium lol! Might give aider another spin. It is never been quite good for my needs but tech evolves.
150.
by coolcase 1y ago
Yeah F# and Typescript are very impressive. We just got used to tonnes of innovation. It ain't UNIX but I'd say Typescript is as impressive. An exoskeleton for JS that rivals Haskell. See also VSCode and WSL. And if we ain't

More ›