cookieperson

11 ms·

91.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Well you tried. You really did. But there are already people trying to form religions around LLMs. Some people can't be reasoned with.
92.
by cookieperson 3y ago
So your current stance is, LLMs can't do everything yet, but don't bother thinking about extending it's capabilities just ask it it can do everything? Fascinating...
93.
by cookieperson 3y ago
So you postulate that the installation of every home appliance will have instructions for how to do so with 100% accuracy in Chatgpt? I don't know about you, but having read many installation instructions... I wouldn't trust most
94.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Imagine explaining to your boss "sorry for taking down prod but really it's all chatgpts fault!". I bet that would go over real real well...
95.
by cookieperson 3y ago
I'm sorry y'all but this is super sad.
96.
by cookieperson 3y ago
It's also just not in its training corpus. It's not. It's in journal articles, etc. But here we go again thinking chat gpt can give us something from nothing. Also a hallucination with a chemical reaction could easily mean de
97.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Well if they are interested in data. If they are interested in asking a prompt "hey what's my cc number and password again?" That'd bypass an awful lot of encryption. Would also be easy to find blackmail for a lot of peo
98.
by cookieperson 3y ago
This is actually a pretty sound summary of the two. The one guy just got charged for rape, recently another one of his companies went down for fraud, he invited a riot on j6 to overthrow democracy, is under investigation for stealing hundre
99.
by cookieperson 3y ago
So a hackers main goal will be to get your LLM data, and companies will be backdooring them?
100.
by cookieperson 3y ago
So if you tried to follow this as a chemist you would fail. This is an incredibly vague and useless summary. But to a lay person woooo chatgpt!!! Woooo chatgpt knows everything wooooo!!! Here's the kicker... There's decades old so
101.
by cookieperson 3y ago
It goes against their interests to do that. The closest you get to that is academic papers written from industry and patents. As far as that goes, there are millions of those.
102.
by cookieperson 3y ago
This comment doesn't even make sense...
103.
by cookieperson 3y ago
A lot of data science techniques came from chemists. I don't think this comment really holds water.
104.
by cookieperson 3y ago
This has already been done for years... Unironically a lot of it has also been using ML for decades. I know people in boring industries like dairy, or paint who have 30 yrs old ml models that work excellently that they maintain. The differe
105.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Even if there are no bathrooms around it's not like the law allows that. Saw a video where a cop arrested a fire man for stepping several inches over a line while putting out a fire. Literally handcuffed and thrown in the car. Also saw
106.
by cookieperson 3y ago
It's really hard for poor people or even moderately wealthy people to enter legal battles like these against corporations. A corp can delay trial for five yrs. Having a lawyer on retainer for even 4 months would bankrupt most Americans
107.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Hasn't this been posted 4x this week? Feel like I've seen this many times...
108.
by cookieperson 3y ago
No the answer is for workers rights to exist in America and for us to regulate how machines programmed by people treat people. There's a human component to work done by humans.
109.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Can't reply to the post below me. But yea I am not on the side of child abuse ie "kicking a child's shit in" or for mass incarceration or mass surveillance...
110.
by cookieperson 3y ago
How many kids played ding ding ditch as a kid? How many teenagers stole a pack of gum as a dare? How many drunk college kids peed on a tree in a public place? Should that kid get a citation? Should that kid end up in small claims court? Sh
111.
by cookieperson 3y ago
It is overzealous. Imagine if every minor crime or social faux pas you've ever committed was logged, stored to disk, and accessible to various for profit 3rd parties. Little bit dystopian. Middle and upper class people can pay the fine
112.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Ignore race. Should amazon drivers be fired for not peeing in jugs, aka using a public restroom, to follow AI planned routes? What about Pepsi drivers taking unsanctioned 5 min breaks because they have a pounding headache? How about having
113.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Just wait, most the people interested in using these tools for spam haven't gotten it figured out yet. They are working hard though, and once they figure it out it will be more prolific then human traffic by orders of magnitude.
114.
by cookieperson 3y ago
They should take it seriously. If a lot of your product is mostly copy pastable why on earth would you feed even pieces of it to a third party? There's so many legal and logistical issues with it it isn't even funny. People using
115.
by cookieperson 3y ago
I see where you're going with this. Gen Z hates home ownership! You've done a great job making this world for your children and grand children!
116.
by cookieperson 3y ago
One of my favorite bloggers on this platform.
117.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Gen Z is in crippling debt and can't afford cars. Hmm how can we make this sound better...
118.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Might surprise you how many people are using pandas or dataframes for OLTP on a daily basis because they don't know better.
119.
by cookieperson 3y ago
It might surprise you to learn that Julia is actively relying on code written in/for R to perform computations. You might be surprised to find out that people who can write R can also write C++ C and other languages of their choosing.
120.
by cookieperson 3y ago
Is it that I have done something wrong here, or is it possible the Julia community can't handle its own reality. If you reread what I wrote here... You'd actually see it's advice. It's advice from someone who has helped

More ›