constantcrying

9 ms·

61.
by constantcrying 9mo ago
Sure, Times New Roman is not a great font and comes with many negative connotations. But having official government communication look like a highschoolers first digital essay is even worse. The obvious solution is doing what many large com
62.
by constantcrying 9mo ago
>Outsourced devs wielding smart models are even cheaper than onshore But they do not compete. They have totally different jobs.
63.
by constantcrying 9mo ago
No. The problem with DB are not the trains or the personnel on the trains. The problem is that the tracks are in miserable condition and that they are operated in a terrible way. The fault in this case is 100% with DB. Nobody else is to bla
64.
by constantcrying 9mo ago
>But that's exactly the promise of LLMs by the hypepeople behind it. I do not know and do not care what the "hypepeople" say. I can tell you that, by pure logic alone, LLMs will be superior at simple and routine tasks so
65.
by constantcrying 9mo ago
>After working with agent-LLMs for some years now, I can confirm that they are completely useless for real programming. >They never helped me solve complex problems with low-level libraries. They can not find nontrivial bugs. They don
66.
by constantcrying 9mo ago
Totally delusional. The article does not even try to figure out why any of this happened. In all of the cases the main prediction that was made came true. The cost, especially the human cost, of developing some piece of software dramatica
67.
by constantcrying 9mo ago
In other news: https://www.electrive.com/2025/12/17/powerco-starts-unified-... It is totally absurd how far Tesla has fallen behind legacy auto makers, who are now starting up their own battery production and
68.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
>Put another way, decidability is a large area of mathematical research. What does ZF(C) have to do with decidability? Decidability is a question in any sufficiently complex system (Gödel's first theorem). And exactly this distincti
69.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
To be honest I do not think that these word games are helpful at all. Throughout all of my mathematical education what has always helped me to keep my "mental workspace clean", was to never abandon the model. > and correctly ta
70.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
I am sure that my vitriol against immigration more than makes up for me (having no "immigration background" at all) continuing to stay in the EU :P
71.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
>Math But the first exercise is about judging statements based on nebulous definitions, definitely unrelated to mathematics?
72.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
I am sorry, but "you are dumb" is not an argument. I just do not care about the law at all+. Far too often have I seen justice abused in the name of the law. Any appeal to some supposed legality just rings entirely hollow. Either
73.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
I think it is pretty dishonest how you are asserting that I am making arguments, which I never made. >which means the immigrants with the most optionality of where to go (like researchers, engineers, and high value contributors in genera
74.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
Do you think that such a deportation would make the US more or less appealing for immigration? After all, every immigrant has to suspect that they might become a target of such an enforcement action as well.
75.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
>In our country, someone who hasn't been convicted or otherwise adjudicated of a crime is called innocent. Total nonsense. This only applies to the state. Individuals are totally free to believe that a person not convicted of a crim
76.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
As a European I am not particularly invested in how the US legal system wants to protect non-citizens "rights". I just hope that the EU learns how effective immigration deterrence looks and can make the appropriate legal changes,
77.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
Sure, if you can think of better deterrents for migration and better ways to deport more people, then those should be tried as well. Right now I think these measures are extremely effective, especially at deterrence and I do not see what yo
78.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
Targeting "innocent" people is the point. It makes sure that nobody wants to come in. >which actually has the effect of keeping dangerous people (always been high-priority) in the country longer. I agree. The processing should
79.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
It fills me with joy to know that those are irreconcilable. It lifts the burden of having to reconcile these things and I know that my self expression can be directed elsewhere. Whatever beauty exists in engineering comes from the purity of
80.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
Well, since those men in shirts built the whole thing up, I am not disappointed that they are hated for it by the right people. >suits shirts was what I said. Not suits.
81.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
>The CTO of a startup I worked at hated dependencies. We worked with some 3D calculations (software for drones), and he was writing tens of mathematical functions himself. What a terrible idea. Implementing mathematical functions is extr
82.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
The world was a much better place when engineering was done by men in dress shirts, who saw technical excellence as their professional obligation, but then returned home to their families and could leave their professional life behind. Peop
83.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
Even if a developer had used an AI tool to ask a question about a library, it would have been a lie. The question is stupid and I think Sandfall should be given the benefit of doubt that they interpreted the question not literally, but in a
84.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
Really makes it clear how ridiculous the mania about AI usage is. The game is great and there is absolutely nothing in it that would suggest to the player that AI was used for anything. Putting essentially arbitrary limitation on which tool
85.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
Have you ever used a modern CAD tool like Fusion or onshape and done constraint based modeling?
86.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
>Non-Euclidean geometry (geometric axioms in which one postulate is rejected such that the 3 angles of a triangle are not exactly 180 degrees) was considered a meaningless word game and fundamental mistruth. This is just a lie though. No
87.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
To be honest, I found Fusion 360 and Onshape very intuitive to learn. >and if one has trouble modeling something, well, arriving at a solution is just a matter of learning the appropriate mathematics. Which is the terrible thing about Op
88.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
I think that modern CAD software, like Onshape or Fusion 360 is quite easy to learn. I have no doubt that AutoCAD is difficult to grasp, but it is not a good representative of what is possible. >It's extremely easy to pick up if yo
89.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
OpenSCAD is very cool, but completely unusable once you understand how great state of the art CAD Software like Fusion or Onshape is. The big distinction is that those work implicitly , while OpenSCAD requires you to be implicit.
90.
by constantcrying 10mo ago
What PLM software is Airbus using right now? Why isn't it running on prem already?

More ›