coliveira

6 ms·

61.
by coliveira 4mo ago
This, along with many other recent deals, shows that there is no real competition between these mega companies. They're at this point only orchestrating the market (or should I say scheming) to build an oligopoly and move as much resou
62.
by coliveira 4mo ago
There may be some low hanging fruit, but they're not available to people without deep understanding of how the math works. Well paid people already spend a lot of time thinking about this.
63.
by coliveira 4mo ago
Don't forget the stolen data from books and papers. You'll never get anything intelligent without using the stolen data they had access to.
64.
by coliveira 4mo ago
This is the biggest illusion of the media. They portray themselves as informing in an independent way. But any quick analysis will show that they can only report what their clients let them. And in the West their loyalty is to wealthy famil
65.
by coliveira 4mo ago
That's a completely revisionist take. These apps were seen as the next wave of social networks that would compete with Facebook when it bought them.
66.
by coliveira 4mo ago
> capital markets are ridiculously deep. American market valuation is more than twice the entire US GDP. So ridiculous is a good description of what's going on.
67.
by coliveira 4mo ago
They will defend it the way any good monopoly always does: buying the competition. Case in point is Facebook: it is just a social network, the way they really stay on top is buying other companies and paying for people to spend even more ti
68.
by coliveira 4mo ago
The stock market is just a game that rich people use to manipulate money. It is not a reflection of the real world. Consider for example Google, one of the companies with highest valuation in the market. If Google stops working now, the onl
69.
by coliveira 4mo ago
People buying into space x are basically telling Musk to do anything he wants with their money, no questions asked...
70.
by coliveira 4mo ago
Ask Warren Buffet how concerned he was of "missing" on bubbles... He got richer than pretty much everybody else by just avoiding bubbles and then buying assets at fire sale prices when they inevitably popped.
71.
by coliveira 4mo ago
> because he was at MIT people took it seriously One of the differences between MIT and other schools is that MIT has paid staff to promote in the media anything their faculty does. A book by professors at most universities has zero prom
72.
by coliveira 4mo ago
Microsoft always hated their customers. And their competitors. And their suppliers too. The only people they don't hate really are their shareholders.
73.
by coliveira 4mo ago
This is so true! I've never seen a software company more disgusting than MS.
74.
by coliveira 5mo ago
The connections between Trump and intelligence have really been hidden by the media, but they're quite obvious. He was running a "model agency" just like Epstein, so he was in the same business. His luxury real estate busines
75.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Many of these people follow a pattern, where they (apparently) come from nothing and very early in their careers become advisors or get capital from a very rich and powerful person/company. This should give you pause and realize that i
76.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Don't forget Bill Gates. People generally don't know he's heir of one of the richest banking families in Washington state.
77.
by coliveira 5mo ago
The time to do this was 30 years ago. While today we need it more than ever, it is probably already too late: corporations will find those trying to do this and stop them.
78.
by coliveira 5mo ago
The "resources" are off the books, it must be just the tip of the iceberg.
79.
by coliveira 5mo ago
It has always been ok to talk about psychosis in the general public, known as a "mass psychosis". Why is that suddenly a problem for CEOs?
80.
by coliveira 5mo ago
The issue is that French, Italian, African, Japanese people shouldn't have the inconvenience of instructing the LLM tool to get the basic facts about their own culture. They should use an LLM that has already been trained like that by
81.
by coliveira 5mo ago
A woman is a human being. An AI is a machine.
82.
by coliveira 5mo ago
As an American you should probably not trust them, because the giant American company has way more (legal or semi-legal) opportunities to manipulate your life than a Chinese one.
83.
by coliveira 5mo ago
This is the next phase of the OpenAI deception: give us as much money as we want or you'll be labeled anti-US and pro-China (guaranteed by the propaganda arm of openAI).
84.
by coliveira 5mo ago
No, the money is not coming from a fixed box. When the US wants to do something (typically starting a new war), they never ask where the money is coming from. This tells you everything about how the decisions are made, if it is a priority f
85.
by coliveira 5mo ago
But he didn't, it was given to him by AI.
86.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Nothing of this is particular to Japan, it's only the way it manifests in Japan that is adapted to its rich culture. Zombie corporations, corporations with ties to the government, family owned companies, monopolies, cronyism, all of th
87.
by coliveira 5mo ago
For all its worth this could just be an AI generated blog post. There is no code, no repository, no link to any use.
88.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Scientology is essentially a scheme to get private/incriminating information from very important people. Why the surprise?
89.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Buffet was severely handicapped by the amount of money he had available. He mentioned that himself. If he had to manage only a smaller amount of money he would easily achieve 40% or more per year.
90.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Unless you're over trading (which is not the goal) you'll pay very little because you're buying and not selling for several years. This will end up being less than the fee you pay to the ETF every year.

More ›