coliveira

7 ms·

91.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Unless you have huge amount of money to play, there is no need to buy dozens of stocks every month. If you already have a portfolio of several stocks, you can buy just one or two every month and increase your portfolio. If you are just star
92.
by coliveira 5mo ago
What is the problem? If you buys a SP500 ETF you're effectively buying 500 stocks. You don't need that much, but if that is your wish it is still better than using ETFs.
93.
by coliveira 5mo ago
It's not stolen if it was taken from Tesla, investors already agreed that Elon can do anything he pleases with their money.
94.
by coliveira 5mo ago
How can something that is a million times bigger than your home be any different, right?
95.
by coliveira 5mo ago
This is simply called disruption. They really don't care.
96.
by coliveira 5mo ago
AI is the new religion, and one needs to be stupid to believe it.
97.
by coliveira 5mo ago
ETFs are a trap. Put most of your money in single stocks. It is ok to diversify, you don't need an ETF for this.
98.
by coliveira 5mo ago
You're completely right, although I believe this number was not decided personally. They just happened to pick algorithms that have this "nice" property because it will lead to the same result.
99.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Democrats will not let people choose candidates because that may be too dangerous for their interests. We'll never get good candidates as long as the current leadership is in control.
100.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Technically this is right. But if that is the case (and it seems to be), then a coin flip is better than their models. Because we only care about the current election, not a sequence of 1000 elections (which will not happen, by the way).
101.
by coliveira 5mo ago
It is the government that wants these companies to do this, so they can get access to the data!
102.
by coliveira 5mo ago
The day a low income retiree can have meetings with politicians to lobby for their favorite policies is the day this comparison will be useful.
103.
by coliveira 5mo ago
They don't care about boomers, it is the wealth of billionaires that they care about.
104.
by coliveira 5mo ago
The government is very decided on not letting one happen, or hiding any minor recession. They will throw money at the problem as long as they can.
105.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Ok, propaganda machine, this must be fantastic.
106.
by coliveira 5mo ago
Both are terrible options, why should I root for one of them? Look what Israel is doing in Gaza, are they gonna be good for Iran now?
107.
by coliveira 5mo ago
This is not just a joke, it is a legal nightmare. You may be giving away the copyright ownership, or at least part of it, to Microsoft.
108.
by coliveira 6mo ago
Most complete copies of anything were destroyed by the end of the ancient world. So that is not a surprise. Even the bible that most people considered sacred only has copies from the 4th century and at one point the only Hebrew sources avai
109.
by coliveira 6mo ago
Europe is at the mercy of the USA. Any difference in posture is due to local politics which can swing local elections, but European leaders are willing and eager to do what the US wants.
110.
by coliveira 6mo ago
> in democracies you can reject the government No, you cannot. You can reject the current party, but the government is much more than that. In the US, for example, the government is a set of institutions that were put in power in the Ame
111.
by coliveira 6mo ago
It's not the current administration that started this process. The US has for decades gone against the Europeans, step after step, asserting policies that only favor US companies. In the past however, the US administrations sugarcoated
112.
by coliveira 6mo ago
This is reality TV with animals. Like any reality TV show, the events and reactions are manipulated. I wouldn't put any credibility on this.
113.
by coliveira 6mo ago
I never used adblock because if I don't like ads on a particular website I will simply not visit it anymore. And if I like it enough despite of the ads, I want to support them financially in some way.
114.
by coliveira 6mo ago
For many people with decent traffic I believe it makes sense to sell their own local ads instead of depending on a network like Adsense.
115.
by coliveira 6mo ago
Correct. Google had initially a good program that was based on keywords and non-intrusive ads. They killed that in the pursuit of more profits.
116.
by coliveira 6mo ago
Large news sites still depend on ads. They don't make much, but there's not much else they can do to increase revenue.
117.
by coliveira 6mo ago
Exactly, it is already a pattern that Google will start paying good money for ads and then progressively reduce the pay to its publishers. It is a bait and switch strategy, but they'll certainly say that it is just an algorithm improve
118.
by coliveira 6mo ago
Most probably it was on purpose. MS is famous for the infighting of internal groups and how the management doesn't know how to control their divisions.
119.
by coliveira 6mo ago
This makes sense, because even in the best times Windows was not the biggest money maker for Microsoft, it was Office. So MS was never fully behind Windows, it was only the means to an end, which was selling the most software for enterprise
120.
by coliveira 6mo ago
You're considering open source development as just another commercial endeavor. The fact that this is done by a nonprofit organization means it's pursuing goals that are not strictly commercial, and that is fine. Think about the G

More ›