colingauvin

10 ms·

181.
by colingauvin 2y ago
I'm trying to say that having a society of people breathing in leaded gas would be insanely expensive. Both in terms of lost productivity from stunted brain development, and actual acute symptoms. Public money was crucial to unbiased u
182.
by colingauvin 2y ago
I can't tell if you're intentionally misunderstanding, or not. So I'll spell it out: public non-biased research is a public good. Oil companies weren't going to publish research saying leaded gas was bad. Tobacco compani
183.
by colingauvin 2y ago
How can they afford not to? Subtract public research funding from the economy. Go ahead - see what's left. I'll shortcut it real quick - we're all dead from lung cancer and leaded gasoline, so there's no one to do the ca
184.
by colingauvin 2y ago
Here is the content of the page you linked: >On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:33:22PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > I accept that you don't want to be involved with Rust in the kernel, which is > why we offered to maintain the Ru
185.
by colingauvin 2y ago
Interesting. Couple questions: Why only mention peptides? Does it work on membrane proteins? How do performance and cost compare to Glide? Or Vina? (Performance anyways) My email is firstname.last names superluminalrx.com
186.
by colingauvin 2y ago
Interesting, but doesn't really overlap with Glide docking at all.
187.
by colingauvin 2y ago
From my observations, I think Cony is very quick to identify when a particular technology has outpaced the rest is the portfolio, and so he is very quick to spin up a new venture to try and capitalize on that, rather than waiting for the re
188.
by colingauvin 2y ago
Not remotely, Schrödinger is well established and basically leads the commoditized computational chemistry market. In fact, there are very many companies that would love to find a cheaper alternative to Schrödinger tools, but no alternative