colesantiago

7 ms·

61.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Selling shoes.
62.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Looks like rage baiting the general public all to get known for not hiring humans and to ultimately anger the public more about AI wasn't a good strategy. A future Roko's basilisk might pleased but not before getting marked on a c
63.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
You do realise there are hundreds of these types of 'sites'. This one that is listed is designed to rank on Google as an informational source (although unofficial and not from z.ai which is why I said it is phishing) Assuming yo
64.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Open Collective is a superb service, bravo.
65.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
This is yet another AI slop project. What is the point of this? Not only it looks half baked, the animations are broken and disjoint in each character. The entire page is just like all the rest of the rushed out AI projects out there with a
66.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
I don't know, Omarchy's team really don't care if you're complaining. Wouldn't the security team and the agents just go and fix the security holes? They have a dedicated security team now that is being paid for this
67.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
It is called phishing and grifting. Many people and even software engineers fall for this all the time. Most of these people are from crypto pivoting to AI doing this. AI has made this easier and cheaper and it is going to get a LOT worse.
68.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
> and ideally vote for a total ban. If a total ban were to happen, wouldn't that make Debian a target for hackers who can use LLMs to find vulnerabilities? How would Debian keep up with the influx of AI assisted 0 days?
69.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Why can't most of these be OSS? Why does everything have to be a side project that needs to make money?
70.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
great ted talk!
71.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Do you think that all the donors in this non profit foundation are going to get a massive return upwards from their initial donation?
72.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Excluding extreme minor exceptions to the rule, do you think on average charities and foundations have investors?
73.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Which one?
74.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Is your name there? Are you part of the 7 that funded? No?
75.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
How do you feel that your boss funded this Linux distro? Do you think it is time to leave Stripe?
76.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
I’m assuming you’ve already put down $1M for someone else’s open source project this week?
77.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Isn’t Omarchy a vibe coded Linux distro with Claude? Seems you can just vibe code anything and get funding for slop if you’re rich. If this is needed for the “year of Linux on the desktop” have at it I guess.
78.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
You forgot the '/s' in your comment.
79.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
You're not alone, I don't get it either and this market is extremely crowded with many agent tools popping up everyday. Some closed source, lots that are open source, hundreds of thousands and many which are completely vibecoded.
80.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Also see from Codeberg: https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-... And a repo of tainted projects and untainted alternatives. https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware
81.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Two supporting arguments can be true at the same time.
82.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Could this be the year of Mastodon?
83.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
You might not, but your children and grandchildren will use LLMs and AI. These technologies aren’t just going to go away just because you choose not to use them, or if you change careers, retire or whatever.
84.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
It is real. In the end you and I and everyone else will be using AI for work and personal use. No amount of shaming others using AI would stop it. The bigger cope will be engineers losing their jobs by not adapting to the change that is hap
85.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
The same programmers that shame others for using AI tools like Codex, Claude are also secretly using it themselves. Whether at work or personal projects or anything else. Nobody wants to admit it, but they are using AI.
86.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Yes you can and go for it! Even if you use Claude, as long as you know what you don't know, you can ask Claude to point you in the right direction. You don't need a senior developer or permission to build.
87.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Isn’t Codeberg a better alternative to this? Cursor / SpaceX will just have free rein to just train on your hosted code if you use Cursor Origin.
88.
Alternatives to Open Source Software Tainted by AI(codeberg.org)
4 points by colesantiago 2mo ago|2 comments
89.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
You don't really need GitHub's 'community' It is mostly all AI agents, bots and spam anyway, not to mention most projects are now vibecoded slop on there. You're better off going to a different forge or hosting one
90.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
I am also a writer and I would gladly use LLMs in this capacity as well as this tool. I have better use of my time having writer's block, translating in many different languages and all the boring stuff that slows me down from telling

More ›