colesantiago

6 ms·

91.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
> many HN users take issue with that. It seems that the only people who are hating on this aren't even writers themselves. But very grumpy programmers on HN who probably don't write (except probably documentation) and probably
92.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
To those on HN that are hating on this, why? There isn't even any tracking or account setup with the OP's software? I'm curious if you have your own creation that doesn't use LLMs at all that you think everyone can ben
93.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
What type of hate are you getting if you don't mind me asking? I like your tool by the way, I don't understand what sort of person would have such visceral hate towards someone's creation. They don't have to use it but
94.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
> The issue they are having is moderation, not technical costs. This is the same issue sites like Reddit have. In the article, they even mention that private social media sites use moderation centres from poor countries. That is abhorren
95.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Where? Is Stripe that bad?
96.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
I don't see anything wrong with this article. I quite like projects getting funding and reporting what they did with said funding. > It provides no content or value except for advertising Sniffnet and GH SOSF. Is advertising Sniffne
97.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Yes, 9.9/10 times it doesn't work. For every Wikipedia or Thunderbird that gets millions in donations you get thousands of others that cannot live off sparse donations alone. And since you are lazy to read the article: "After
98.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
> Pangram, the AI-powered AI detection tool? Well if AI says it it must be true! Well it is better than most and everyone has heard of Pangram.
99.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
I used Pangram on the text of the article and it said it is 100% AI generated. The title didn't help either.
100.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
> "Ed Zitron Was Wrong About AI. [The Argument Keeps Moving.]" Unless I am missing some poor attempt at satire here, this article is completely 100% AI generated, which is where I stopped reading.
101.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
> Yes it does. Hobbyists are willing to spend their own money, hence their blog doesn't need ads. Until it is unsustainable which is the majority of cases due to no funding. > Wikipedia is donation supported. The majority of webs
102.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
The real answer, like with any service in the real world is to charge for it. That is the only way to keep any service online sustainable without ads. There are also donations, but that can only take you so far. Things cost money, server co
103.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
That doesn’t answer their question, like at all.
104.
Grok Bot by SpaceXAI(x.ai)
59 points by colesantiago 2mo ago|14 comments
105.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
So Pangram is the best one right now, that all I need to know, and I can safely assume that the Claude AI marks will make it even stronger. Thanks! > But the burden of proof is on them... I mean is this enough proof? https://w
106.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
This is on Pangram 3 which is very very old now and the founder responded below https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/i-wouldnt-say-pangram-i... What about on Pangram 4? https://www.pangram.com/blog&#x2F
107.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
You're saying because it has some false positives that Pangram is 100% a scam? Is their research also a scam too? https://pangram-public.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/pdf/pangra... https://www.pangram.com&
108.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Then what is the best way to know that something is AI generated slop then?
109.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
(This is the part where you provide extensive extraordinary evidence to your claim)
110.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Good. They should make it easier, to detect slop so we can ignore it quickly. I hope Pangram makes an API or an extension to analyze a page to detect slop on a page and then closes the tab immediately. Nobody should be wasting time on garba
111.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
Just login then? Still works fine.
112.
Tl;dv: Over 180k meetings left wide open(bobdahacker.com)
633 points by colesantiago 2mo ago|208 comments
113.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
What alternatives are there to Apple hardware that people like this Theo person would use?
114.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
This is really REALLY BAD. What other data did the attackers get other than the email?
115.
by colesantiago 2mo ago
i recently left anthropic a few weeks ago, it was tough but had to leave for my own mental health. i'm getting bombarded with offers from other rival ai labs, hedge funds, tech startups and even early stage investors. had i known not t
116.
by colesantiago 3mo ago
> I am sure VCs are fighting to invest and they will get 4B investment immediately with this team This is probably the only time some prominent VCs would be active during August, only for Jeff Dean & Co's company. I can see them
117.
by colesantiago 3mo ago
It is good for Demis and Google overall. This is a promotion for Demis and this could be a path for Demis to be CEO of Alphabet in the future in the AI era. Google already invested in Discovery Loop (Jeff Dean, Orol Vinyals, Quoc Le and San
118.
Changes at Google DeepMind: Demis Hassabis from CEO to Chair, Jeff Dean departs(blog.google)
867 points by colesantiago 3mo ago|933 comments
119.
by colesantiago 3mo ago
> "independent public company" But they are not independent though, they will be owned by Wall Street should they go public. Instead they remain in the private markets for a long time and sell secondary shares, just like what S
120.
by colesantiago 3mo ago
No. But my agents are.

More ›