colek42

4 ms·

1.
by colek42 9d ago
CI needs to be decentralized, and the agents should run the test and verify the proof. This avoids all those API calls.
2.
by colek42 10d ago
I'm working on something that removes CI completely and lets your agents certify their own tests. It is pretty rough right now but I'd love feedback -- pushgate.dev
3.
by colek42 2mo ago
I really wish they would support SPIFFE/SPIRE
4.
Show HN: CI/Lock – signed evidence of what your CI ran(cilock.dev)
1 points by colek42 3mo ago|0 comments
5.
Show HN: CI/lock – supply-chain attestation CLI, from the Witness creators(cilock.dev)
1 points by colek42 4mo ago|0 comments
6.
by colek42 4mo ago
In 2016 I was working for an organization that wanted a video streaming web app, but could not tolerate any latency. In the past, we solved this with an NAPI extension in Firefox. They removed this for good security reasons, but it left o
7.
by colek42 4mo ago
There are ways to do it. Send me a message, and I can make an intro to the person we use.
8.
by colek42 5mo ago
We built https://aflock.ai/ (open source) to help with this. Constraining activity tends to work well
9.
by colek42 6mo ago
DSSE is great for this, if you need more schema use in-toto
10.
by colek42 6mo ago
We started a "science project" taking concepts from Multi Level Security to constraining AI agents. https://aflock.ai/ . The idea is to have different data zones, and if an Agent accesses from a private zone, they
11.
by colek42 7mo ago
We love Dapr's durabletask-go. https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/dapr/durabletask-go
12.
by colek42 7mo ago
Where is your line, copy editing, drafting, reorganizing? You are going to have a busy, boring, and angry life if you want to comment on every post that has signs AI touched it.
13.
by colek42 7mo ago
My job is to communicate quickly and clearly, AI helps me do my job faster and more efficiently. But thanks for telling me how I should do my job. You come off as both ignorant and arrogant.
14.
by colek42 7mo ago
That is quite an ignorant statement to make. I spent three years in combat, and am permanently disabled from my service.
15.
Anthropic vs. DoD: "Any lawful use" is a fight about control
2 points by colek42 7mo ago|8 comments
16.
by colek42 7mo ago
Bingo, DoD does not want Anthropic to set guardrails on the technology it buys. If they don't want to abide they are free to deny service. We all know how that will turn our for them with the current administration. All while the Do
17.
by colek42 7mo ago
The voters and congress tell the military how to use technology, not Anthropic. Shifting the decision to Anthropic takes away power from the citizenship. Edit: The point is, go vote if you don't agree with what the administration is
18.
by colek42 1y ago
We just built a new version of the witness run action that tracks the who/what/when/where and why of the GitHub actions being used. It provides "Trusted Telemetry" in the form of SLSA and in-toto attestations. htt
19.
by colek42 2y ago
When I saw the tj-actions attack, I decided it was time to finally implement action wrapping with our `witness-run-action`. This will generate signed attestations on exactly what the actions are doing. We have some more testing to do befor
20.
Shifting 'Shift Left' and What We Can Learn from Uber(productgovernance.substack.com)
2 points by colek42 2y ago|0 comments
21.
Shifting 'Shift Left' and What We Can Learn from Uber(productgovernance.substack.com)
1 points by colek42 2y ago|0 comments
22.
by colek42 2y ago
I've been thinking about this a lot. First, the author should replace security with compliance. Currently they are two different things. There is a huge divide between compliance teams and developers, they speak completely different
23.
How to Shift Compliance Left – A Letter to Developers(productgovernance.substack.com)
3 points by colek42 2y ago|0 comments
24.
Shifting Compliance Left – A Letter to Compliance Teams(productgovernance.substack.com)
2 points by colek42 2y ago|0 comments
25.
by colek42 3y ago
We would love for you to talk about this at one of our in-toto community meetings. Let me know if you are interested. contact info is in the comments, or feel free to stop by #in-toto on CNCF slack
26.
by colek42 3y ago
Provenance is NOT injecting secret data into the build process. Provenance (scoped to supply chain security) is a document that describes the process in which the artifact goes through to become an artifact, to include all steps such as
27.
by colek42 3y ago
Step one is actually wanting to improve security. Those IoT companies have no motivator. Most of our business is with Federal/Defense and Finance. Those companies will only change if liability changes or the regulatory environment f
28.
by colek42 3y ago
I think if we can sufficiently isolate the build process we can solve this problem. Lot's of opportunity with our project Witness to add extra isolation. It is something we are working on. However, the real supply chain security &qu
29.
Building an Effective Enterprise Software Supply Chain Policy(testifysec.com)
1 points by colek42 4y ago|0 comments
30.
Witness is a pluggable framework digital attestation(github.com)
3 points by colek42 4y ago|1 comments

More ›