cointegrated

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by cointegrated 6mo ago

   We did some benchmarking of them internally, but not sure if we'll publish the detailed results. Just in case, keep an eye on https://huggingface.co/spaces/facebook/bouquet : if we release the evaluation resul
2. 2.▲
   by cointegrated 7mo ago

   This project is absolutely NLLB 2.0 in spirit. However, we decided to reserve the name “OMT-NLLB” only to the subset of the new models that have encoder-decoder architecture similar to the original NLLB-200. The other models are called “OMT
3. 3.▲
   by cointegrated 7mo ago

   It is not open weight as of today (unfortunately, for the reasons out of control of us the authors, we weren’t able to release the weights). All we could release is part of the evaluation data. I hope this will change in a while.
4. 4.▲
   by cointegrated 7mo ago

   1.6k languages is for how many we were able to find more or less reliable evaluation data (mostly thanks to Bible translators and all those who contributed to BOUQuET). Out of the remaining several thousand languages, we expect the OMT mod