cognitive_1337

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by cognitive_1337 7y ago

   >MIT has looked at their data and saw that subject test scores are not a key differentiator between students who do well at MIT and students who do not. Objection. Assumes Facts Not In Evidence. Following the OP link reveals no such anal
2. 2.▲
   by cognitive_1337 7y ago

   >sailing terminology I've never been sailing but had no problem with the terminology because I read books. Books reflecting our civilization's Greco-Roman and Anglo-American historical ties to seafaring. It's a form of cu
3. 3.▲
   by cognitive_1337 7y ago

   >If he is who he says he is, then he would have find other ways to prove his eliteness/worthiness if subject tests were not being considered No, that's completely wrong and totally incorrect! The SAT II Writing subject test was
4. 4.▲
   by cognitive_1337 7y ago

   My SAT IIs were obviously vital to the package presented to the admissions committee because I lacked two key things critical to UC's usual stringent paradigm. One, my GPA was below Cal's 4.0+ standards. Two, I didn't take
5. 5.▲
   by cognitive_1337 7y ago

   >wouldn't you have preferred to have your admission be based on your ability to have positively contributed to... Uni-bound HS kids don't usually know which field(s) they will study, hence the S.A.T. is a Test for generic Schol