codesushi42

15 ms·

91.
by codesushi42 7y ago
So it doesn't bend over to The CCP. It tried to and would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling kids. Did you not read the memo?
92.
by codesushi42 7y ago
That's irrelevant because plastics are not produced domestically in the US. But the international production explains the decreased consumption of those other raw materials. This article is misleading horse shit.
93.
by codesushi42 7y ago
That wouldn't work for a robotic hand.
94.
by codesushi42 7y ago
No, it's because these things have been replaced by plastics.
95.
by codesushi42 7y ago
SF is the only place in the country where you could say that with a straight face. In fact, that guy has probably long since left and is doing his own beer analytics startup.
96.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Even Java? Java's tooling is top notch. IDE is awesome. Debugging tools are rawsome. Build tools can be... Well you've got choices. Workspace setup is easy
97.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Does this justify hundreds of engineers? No. And the software to do those things isn't worth billions. WeWokeUp.
98.
by codesushi42 7y ago
They may as well just close down now. The morale there must be terrible. Anyone good who survives the cuts will GTFO to greener pastures. Anyone who stays or anyone desperate enough to join will be terrible. Good bye We, consider this my eu
99.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Looks like a mess. Use this instead: https://d2l.ai/
100.
by codesushi42 7y ago
This whole post repeats everything I've been saying while also threatening me with the ban hammer. I am saying that you are missing the big picture. There are much bigger problems here than school yard insults that go unaddressed here,
101.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Height has nothing to do with intelligence, which is what the discussion thread is about.
102.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Claiming 5+ std deviations is a statement, not a sentiment. The author cites a paper that makes no such claim. That counts as a lie.
103.
by codesushi42 7y ago
I guess you didn't look hard enough. Because the top comment is a lie: If you outlaw this, people like me (who think inflicting stupidly and ill-health on their children by withholding these technologies is morally wrong) will just fl
104.
by codesushi42 7y ago
I don't understand this reasoning where, if X is not ok, X must be the only thing moderators care about. That is your reasoning, not mine. It's not against the rules to be wrong, though. How could this be otherwise? Do you thin
105.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Plenty examples here, even with people coming out of the woodwork to support eugenics under false pretenses: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20542738 Look up some accounts (jlawson) and you will find they consistently
106.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Then learn the notation or find another source. This is a bit like complaining about the existence of books because you never learned how to read.
107.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Exactly this. HN is a cesspool of misinformation. Whether it comes from people pushing an agenda, or just plain ignorance. I take everything said here with a grain of salt, and fact check everything . Because I have seen some very creative
108.
by codesushi42 7y ago
I don't know. HN has plenty of misinformation posted on it constantly. Countless posts that are objectively wrong, and in many cases it is done intentionally. I have seen lies supporting eugenics, lies about how quantum computing is a
109.
by codesushi42 7y ago
That is far from the first usable form of Bayes. I have no idea what point you are making. Bayes Theorem is easily derived algebraically using conditional probability and the chain rule. You can also derive it easily with a Venn diagram. Th
110.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Bayes Theorem hardly requires any math notation at all. It would literally take you less than a minute to understand conditional probability. Yikes.
111.
by codesushi42 7y ago
But then who tunes that optimizer?
112.
by codesushi42 7y ago
This is exactly why you work in academia.
113.
by codesushi42 7y ago
My reason is different from most. I am working on difficult problems, more technically difficult than I ever have before. Maybe I will succeed, but I may fail because I'm way in over my head. But if I am in over my head, I hope I get
114.
by codesushi42 7y ago
That is a hoot. History is littered with terrible technology that was widely adopted. At least Meteor never got that far.
115.
by codesushi42 7y ago
No, no one uses this bloated crapware. Want to throw efficiency out the window and code yourself into a corner? Meteor is perfect for that. I like to be more thoughtful about my QPS and payload sizes.
116.
by codesushi42 7y ago
This is incredibly useful for driving games. But like all physics in games, it is better to fake it.
117.
by codesushi42 7y ago
But then who tunes the hyperparameters for the gradient optimizer?
118.
by codesushi42 7y ago
I would if I were to undergo an invasive medical procedure.
119.
by codesushi42 7y ago
Was she part of the study?
120.
by codesushi42 7y ago
How can you be so sure that your brain structure is actually different? Are there any scientific tests that can be performed to support this?

More ›