coder543

21 ms·

211.
by coder543 2y ago
Yes, numpad0 did... but I was pointing out that this choice was illogical. The lmarena results they were replying to only supported a comparison against o1, since o1 effectively matches Grok 3 on the benchmark being replied to (with o1-pro
212.
by coder543 2y ago
The comment I was replying to had replied to an lmarena benchmark link. Perhaps you think that person should have replied to someone else? And, if you want to finish the quote, Karpathy's opinion on this is subjective. He admits it isn
213.
by coder543 2y ago
No... sigmoid10 was comparing with o1 (not o1-pro), which is accessible for $20/mo, not $200/mo. So, the "Elon factor" in your math is +$20/user/month (2x) for barely any difference in performance (a hard sel
214.
by coder543 2y ago
Kindles have literally always behaved like that, from the beginning. The very newest generation of Kindle changed the storage protocol from traditional mass storage (which was compatible with everything) to MTP, which is mildly annoying for
215.
by coder543 2y ago
That does appear to equal exactly 5... would you care to show how it doesn't? $ cat check_math.c #include <stdio.h> int main() { // Define the values as float (32-bit floating point) flo
216.
by coder543 2y ago
The link at the end is both shortened (for tracking purposes?) and unclickable… so that’s unfortunate. Here is the real link to the paper, in a clickable format: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3385412.33
217.
by coder543 2y ago
o1 never cost $200/mo. That was o1-pro, which still isn’t available to Plus or Free users.
218.
by coder543 2y ago
"ChatGPT" can mean many things... If you meant the free 4o-mini model, then yes, this outcome is not surprising, since it is bad at basically anything related to code. If you meant the more powerful o1 or o3-mini models (great nam
219.
by coder543 2y ago
If anyone is interested, the release of Zeta inspired me to write up a blog post this afternoon about LLM tab completions past and future: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43053094
220.
by coder543 2y ago
The release of Zed’s Zeta earlier today made me think more deeply about what I think LLM tab completion systems could be. It has been a long time since I’ve written a proper blog post. Hopefully these thoughts are interesting to someone!
221.
Cipher – A Vision for the Future of Tab Completion(ceres1.space)
3 points by coder543 2y ago|1 comments
222.
by coder543 2y ago
Yes… I’m aware of the history. I’m also aware that WASM solves problems that those previous ones didn’t. Otherwise you would have provided an option that actually met the requirements, if there are so many to choose from. > If you want a
223.
by coder543 2y ago
Containers are a much heavier way to implement a plug-in system, since you will also need to define an RPC of some kind, and they're not architecture-independent unless you require the users to build every container for every architect
224.
by coder543 2y ago
Do those "more mature" options support architecture-independent executables written in Rust or Go, so that a company doesn't need to rewrite their existing code in Java?
225.
by coder543 2y ago
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ You can also sort the issues and see for yourself what the community thinks should be a priority: https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20... I think the takeaway here is not tha
226.
by coder543 2y ago
It doesn't seem like the issue has been entirely ignored: https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/7992#issuecomme... Out of the 55,000 people who have starred the repo (and countless others who have
227.
by coder543 2y ago
> Either way, I don't think I can replace copilot until a model can automatically fine tune itself in the background on the code I've written I don't think Copilot does this... it's really just a matter of the editor
228.
by coder543 2y ago
Two immediate issues that I noticed: 1. If I make a change, then undo, so that change was never made, it still seems to be in the edit history passed to the model, so the model is interested in predicting that change again. This felt too ag
229.
by coder543 2y ago
Based on the blogpost, this appears to be hosted remotely on baseten. The model just happens to be released openly, so you can also download it, but the blogpost doesn't talk about any intention to help you run it locally within the ed
230.
by coder543 2y ago
> Which will always be the best DX for writing code in the browser. The article we're all commenting on is not about running WASM in the browser. WASI in particular may never be supported by browsers.
231.
by coder543 2y ago
“How many stops faster is f/2.8 than f/4.5?” This photography question can be solved with the right equations. A lot of non-reasoning LLMs would spout some nonsense like 0.67 stops faster. Sometimes they’ll leave a stray negative
232.
by coder543 2y ago
I suspect there is a communications breakdown happening here. I'll try to clarify what I was saying, since I think I did a poor job. In Rust, when you define a `#[no_mangle] pub unsafe extern "C"` function, and then compile a
233.
by coder543 2y ago
The limitation is clearly not Rust. Any language that can bind to C libraries can bind to the functions PRQL exposes... the authors just haven't chosen to implement convenient SDKs for many languages. They also list 8 languages, not 4,
234.
by coder543 2y ago
If Rust can only be used with Rust, then it's strange that the project lists a number of other languages in the docs: https://prql-lang.org/book/project/bindings/index.html
235.
by coder543 2y ago
They have more to say than a single cherry picked benchmark from the half dozen. I had asked the other person for additional benchmarks that supported their cause. They refused to point at a single shred of evidence. I agree the Benchmarks
236.
by coder543 2y ago
Butterflies? Easier to catch a caterpillar and set it on the right path to one day flap its wings in just the desired way.
237.
by coder543 2y ago
> C# really seems to be firing on all cylinders right now I actually agree completely: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42898372 I just don’t like seeing people make bold claims without supporting evidence… those ten
238.
by coder543 2y ago
I’m saying C# as a whole, not C# on one example. But, I have already agreed that C#’s performance has become pretty impressive. I also still believe that idiomatic Rust is going to be faster than idiomatic C#, even if C# now supports really
239.
by coder543 2y ago
People have had a long time to submit better C# implementations. You are still providing no meaningful evidence. > Do you realize this is not a mutually exclusive statement? It doesn’t have to be mutually exclusive. You didn’t seem to un
240.
by coder543 2y ago
C# is not in the same realm as C/C++/Rust. Sorry. It is in a distinctly separate and non-overlapping box: https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/... Only the whiskers are touching, and th

More ›