coder543

39 ms·

751.
by coder543 3y ago
> On a Raspberry Pi 4, Piper can generate 2 seconds of audio with only 1 second of processing time. > On a Raspberry Pi 4, voice commands can take around 7 seconds to process with about 200 MB of RAM used. Have you looked into support
752.
by coder543 3y ago
$2/request seems a little ridiculous. I checked the pricing and you’re not wrong… I just feel like that kind of pricing will apply even more industry pressure to develop competition. Decent open source options would be nice too.
753.
by coder543 3y ago
If money is no object, there are some interesting chips out there. The LTC3335 chip[0] is a buck-boost that claims to have a 680nA Iq. Not as low as the TPS7A02, but it looks like it could make up for that in efficiency if your design does
754.
by coder543 4y ago
Unless you are using the paid version (ChatGPT Plus), then you are certainly still talking to the GPT-3 model. Even on ChatGPT Plus, my understanding is that you have to specifically select the new model.
755.
by coder543 4y ago
> Google recently released Flan-UL2 open source which is an order of magnitude more impressive than anything OpenAI has ever open sourced. CLIP has been extremely influential and is still an impressive model. Personally, I have found W
756.
by coder543 4y ago
I recorded myself saying a few sentences from that transcript, then fed it through different Whisper models. "small.en" and "large-v1" both generated "chat GPT", "large-v2" generated "chat-gpt&qu
757.
by coder543 4y ago
In my experience, Whisper does a great job even with specialized terminology. It won't catch everything, but I think it will exceed your expectations. One of the hardest things about Whisper is choosing which model to use; they offer a
758.
by coder543 4y ago
Your link is broken, but perhaps this was the intended link: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/lcd-oled-graphic/...
759.
by coder543 4y ago
> Now imagine it the other way around - if apple had released the jukebox, and ‘remote solution’ had released the iPod. They probably would have both failed, in that case. Apple for delivering a product that wasn't good enough, and
760.
by coder543 4y ago
> As has been said elsewhere Elsewhere... as in the comment that I replied to? Which you then replied to me? I was literally in agreement with the "elsewhere" that you're referring to. Your comments are confusing to me. St
761.
by coder543 4y ago
But compared to the brand recognition of Remote Solution? The Remote Solution Personal Jukebox beat iPod to the punch by 2 years on offering a high capacity 5GB portable MP3 player, but it was not some runaway success. Apple's brand re
762.
by coder543 4y ago
100% agree with your entire comment. That is exactly what I believe too, based on the evidence I've seen. That anecdote is entirely too clever to be accurate. It was probably built on a kernel of truth, but it has been embellished to a
763.
by coder543 4y ago
That's... also what I'm saying, yes. I think we agree? iPod was not successful because it was the only thing offering high storage capacity. It wasn't the only one. iPod was successful because it offered a touch wheel, iTunes
764.
by coder543 4y ago
Those prices were still from over a year before Apple announced the iPod, in a market where technology was rapidly advancing and getting cheaper, and those were the MSRP for single unit quantities, not the bulk order prices that would have
765.
by coder543 4y ago
> I think shows it made a big difference No, it doesn't. It shows that something made a big difference, but that thing absolutely does not have to be the amount of storage.
766.
by coder543 4y ago
I had added this paragraph before you posted but probably after you saw my comment: >> Maybe Apple would have slightly higher storage capacities, but... we're talking about a relatively marginal difference compared to the gulf in
767.
by coder543 4y ago
> One of my key takeaways is the iPod represented not one but multiple simultaneous tech revolutions. Consumer storage until then unseen I disagree entirely, for reasons that should be obvious once we examine the actual state of the mark
768.
by coder543 4y ago
Non-paywalled link: https://huggingface.co/blog/aws-partnership
769.
by coder543 4y ago
Kessler syndome, not Kepler, just FYI
770.
by coder543 4y ago
Then why doesn’t iOS ask users to customize the displayed name of native App Store apps before installing them? As I said, I think it should be consistent, and I don’t think that's a hugely controversial opinion. Also, why don’t Window
771.
by coder543 4y ago
It has been awhile since I've personally tried creating a PWA, but I don't think iOS does any form of extra caching for PWAs. I think it is more likely that you copy/pasted an example service worker that was caching things yo
772.
by coder543 4y ago
I’m fairly sure most people would prefer that Apple offers a version of the Smart App Banner that gives users a simpler install experience for PWAs. I think saurik was just humoring yamtaddle‘s perspective that PWAs should not be able to
773.
by coder543 4y ago
On my phone, when I click "Add to Home Screen", it immediately focuses the name text field and pops up a keyboard. As a user installing an app, I expect to see the name, the icon, possibly a description, and a big, obvious "i
774.
by coder543 4y ago
> AFAIK, such prompts are regular HTML with links to the AppStore. The ones under discussion are not: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/webkit/promoting_a... Apple controls the experience. The developer
775.
by coder543 4y ago
To be clear, this is all we’re talking about: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/webkit/promoting_a... There is no shouting in these Smart App Banners. The entire user-visible experience is completely con
776.
by coder543 4y ago
> As long as installing PWAs requires user initiation with actions in the browser chrome, and can't be initiated by a link in site content, that shouldn't be a problem with PWAs. And that’s all anyone is asking for, which would
777.
by coder543 4y ago
If you add a second page of apps, go into jiggle mode, tap the page indicator dots at the bottom to enter the overview mode, then uncheck a Home Screen. It will still exist, but it will be hidden.
778.
by coder543 4y ago
> I thought it was fairly straightforward to add an "add to home screen" overlay to a webpage with javascript. On Android, yes. On iOS, users have to click “share” and “add to Home Screen”, which practically nobody knows how to
779.
by coder543 4y ago
> There isn't a one size fits all approach. That's exactly why having a smaller device allows everyone to customize it to their needs. If Steam Deck 2.0 were more portable (i.e. smaller and lighter) and that made it too small f
780.
by coder543 4y ago
It's always possible to make a device physically larger after you get it, but it is obviously much harder to make it smaller. The Switch has a large variety of comfort grips available for people who want a larger device, which also l

More ›