Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
code0
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
104 ms
·
1.
▲
by
code0
6y ago
I think it is the verb meaning of "hash". e.g. hash things out i.e. come to an agreement.
2.
▲
by
code0
11y ago
I just watched the same video and it was one of the most insightful things that I have seen recently. Feynman is simply acknowledging that there are a few things in physics which are very difficult reduce to layman concepts. The other bit,
3.
▲
by
code0
11y ago
Snapdeal is an indian e-commerce site. Competitor to Flipkart. Not ad-funded.
4.
▲
by
code0
11y ago
Coverfox.com | Mumbai, India Positions Available: - Frontend Javascript Developer - Python/Django Developer - Technical Architect. * India's fastest growing insurance buying platform. We are venture capital funded, product focused
5.
▲
by
code0
14y ago
This is pretty hilarious from the amazon review quoted in the article: But even with these problems, The Story About Ping has earned a place on my bookshelf, right between Stevens' Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment, and my dog-ea
6.
▲
Inge Druckrey: Teaching to See
(vimeo.com)
2 points
by
code0
14y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
code0
14y ago
I am really curious about the technical reasons how this might have happened.
8.
▲
by
code0
14y ago
The OP is correct. Cardinality in mathematics is the number of elements in a set[1]. What you are probably referring to is the concept of cardinal numbers[2]. I guess you can skip the smug tone. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality
9.
▲
by
code0
17y ago
We should be glad that open source (Linux/Ubuntu) works when it does. Its such a curious case that its expected of Linux to support all myriad kinds of hardware systems. Its the responsibility of the hardware vendor to provide the drivers,
10.
▲
by
code0
17y ago
Lets just say that nobody reads popular science/physics books for "real" understanding. I always thought of them more as entertainers, giving a glimpse into the mysteries of modern physics, even if superficial or exaggerated, clearer than w
11.
▲
by
code0
17y ago
As you said, "average the overall probabilities between a regular game and a switch-style game", which is 1/3 for a game with no-switching and 2/3 for a game with always-switching. Averaging gives you a probability of 1/2. So if you switch,
12.
▲
by
code0
17y ago
There is a certain subtlety to this problem which many people overlook. It is that whether the host <em>always</em> gives the option to switch. Only if the host always gives you the option to switch, there is a benefit in sw
13.
▲
by
code0
17y ago
Sorry for aside post but are the original video lectures available online? I could not find them on Stanford Youtube channel.