Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cnst
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
57 ms
·
631.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
Sure, that's a lot of variation. Sure, some of these features are essential for certain applications, like checksum offload etc. However, most of these features are still uniform enough that a whole bunch of them are supported by sta
632.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
It's not just that — SMS actually get delivered as part of the unused signalling capacity as far as the airwaves are concerned, hence the 160 7bit limitation, to fit into the existing protocols. E.g., as far as the the costs go, I'
633.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
> Negative. Backlighting is vendor specific. Different implementations offer different configurations. Are you joking? For an analogy, do any NIC vendors even provide their own tools for configuring their Ethernet cards? And even if s
634.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
I think those shortcuts are often handled by the driver itself, so, it'll already know the required stepping. Another option could be to provide such stepping explicitly as another sysctl. Otherwise, realistically, the keyboard shortc
635.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
Looks like it's still the same in 2019, based on documentation: * http://bxr.su/f/s?q=lcd_brightness * http://mdoc.su/f/acpi_fujitsu.4 Fun fact: PHK posted the above "architecture"
636.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
> Not to mention that the units don't carry over from one vendor to another. Who cares about the units? When was the last time you used a vendor-provided utility to configure a Network Interface Card, instead of just using ifconfig
637.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
This is not really news; it's been all over the news like a week ago; Raleigh is just late to the party.
638.
▲
Please think architecture (2007)
(lists.freebsd.org)
115 points
by
cnst
7y ago
|
27 comments
639.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
I would say the community is biased the other way around, where everyone always thinks that it's the little guy that has invalid configuration, instead of Google being at fault. What sort of config do you require from the OP? Their do
640.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
Shitz, and here I go thinking I knew everything about these sorts of things by attending a 5-day lunch-time course at Capital Factory on Founders Academy Essentials… So much for those cap tables!
641.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
If they use cookies and lots of user tracking, I'd estimate the big 4 bidding to do it on a budget of just few dozen mils.
642.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
Again? BTW, I'd like to see how much they've spent retrofitting their website to handle the load of the customers trying to find out the details of the outage as it relates to their neighbourhood, and how soon after the start of t
643.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
> The problem at hand is that it is really hard to debug situations like this. Google won't tell you why a particular email is blocked, because that information will be immediately exploited by spammers. This is a pretty big fallacy
644.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
This is actually a great idea. We should implement this two-step approach for anyone trying to email us from Gmail. Sadly, I'd imagine some users don't really have a choice, e.g., an employee whose company is using Gmail from G S
645.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
> I'm actually pretty happy this whole conversation is starting to gain more traction. This exactly. I've been a Gmail user since the day when they've required an invitation in order to signup, and I'm not quite a Go
646.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
If this is the kind of technical advice you provide, which merely assumes that Google can do no wrong, and the user on the other end is incapable of pressing a button on a yet another website that checks email configuration, merely to confi
647.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
No, not at all. There are reports that even if you use G Suite, and whitelist your own domain to send yourself logs through crontab, your may still have problems with the email deliverability. My own domain was blocked for nothing more tha
648.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
I think they change the way it works, and then existing filters may break at one point. I've had this happen to several filters. TBH, it's just easier to re-do the filters. There's also an option to make it apply to old con
649.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
It doesn't seem to work. In fact, IIRC, they simply add a huge button dialogue to any such emails that pass due to a filter to mark it as spam, without any buttons to dismiss their improper suggestion — e.g., you can't even confi
650.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
The problem is that Gmail and G Suite essentially have monopoly on email nowadays. Even some pretty big companies are amongst the users. All startups are using G Suite. As are many billion-dollar companies like Twitter, Arista Networks,
651.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
I'm actually having a similar problem recently, although my messages are declined at the SMTP stage, "due to the very low reputation of the sending domain", which I attribute to the output of certain cron jobs being sent towa
652.
▲
Gmail marking email from me as spam
(mail-archive.com)
475 points
by
cnst
7y ago
|
393 comments
653.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
If you really care about the low latencies, you might want to not pull up megabytes of JavaScript libraries to simply render up a few bytes of text. I have a single server on another continent, yet my pages load several times faster than an
654.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
I'd imagine most folks in Romania can also easily get away with never owning a car in their lifetime, without any perceivable negative connotations to their quality of life, whilst it's not really a possibility in most parts of th
655.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
> California high gas price might have more things to do with location, affordability, and demand than what people are willing to attribute to it. Not buying this. It'd been widely reported that California has different requirement
656.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
> Is there a chance that someone on the same outgoing network as you is spamming heavily and you get also blamed because of it? No. If you read beyond the title, you'll notice an interesting point that IP address itself is not act
657.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
> Site operators have to use cloudflare, and they do because blocking tor is one of the easiest ways to reduce spam. But most commonly Cloudflare just blocks access to what should have been a static version of the website in the first p
658.
▲
Unable to email anyone from my primary domain; thanks Google Mail and G Suite
(mailman.nanog.org)
7 points
by
cnst
7y ago
|
2 comments
659.
▲
Printer Tracking Dots
(eff.org)
2 points
by
cnst
7y ago
|
0 comments
660.
▲
by
cnst
7y ago
I think it's also a problem when people are rewarded for finding these kinds of bugs that are not actual bugs. Some bad person vandalised an obscure public Oracle repository on GitHub that's not even for any public product they&#x
More ›