Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cmiles74
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
331.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
I think that even summaries are not fair use when they get to a certain length. The Cliff Notes company has to license the material that they summarize, why not OpenAI?
332.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
This should have faster file access than Docker Desktop. For large projects, disabling SIP may be worth the increase in performance.
333.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
IMHO being laid off is stressful, even if you can logically tell yourself it's not yet time to worry (i.e. you have a good amount of savings). I sincerely doubt these employees felt anything like being on vacation. As to a "less d
334.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
There's a lot of truth in this comment and a lot that I wholeheartedly agree with. When I spend time on something that turns out to be incorrect, I would prefer it to be because of choice I made instead of some random choice made by an
335.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
Did I read this correctly? It sounds like YouTube will continue to host his content, but will now pocket the money they would have paid him. That doesn't seem right to me. If they were to cease hosting his material, that would maych th
336.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
IMHO, there's no good substitute for doing the work yourself. There are many strategies for reading source code, one of them may be a better use of time than fussing with an LLM.
337.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
There are many unions in the US. My partner is a member of a union and has much better healthcare and, overall, a better benefit package than I do. They work at the state university.
338.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
It would be nice to work for a successful company, see that company earn record quarterly profits and then not have to worry about being laid off. Pay is important but, arguably, job security even more so.
339.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
Healthcare is pretty reliant on software, that's an area that strikes me as being susceptible to something like this. Banks and their associated (i.e. Equifax) are also in a position where this kind of feedback from developers could ma
340.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
I have yet to see an ad this clever! It's 2023 and the ads I'm served are for things I already recently purchased (and don't need to buy again) or similar to something I have recently purchased or a cheap knock-off of somethi
341.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
I think the larger point is that if the prison is unable to meet the dietary and medical needs of SBF, when they know his expensive attorneys will loudly complain in court and in public, what is it like for regular people who only have a pu
342.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
Or make as much money as you can, while you can.
343.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
The parking app is the worst, IMHO. I can see the parking space but I have to figure out which parking app works with this particular lot and then hope I don't get a ticket.
344.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
I recently saw an advertisement for a comedy show that would let you bring your smart phone but required that it be stored in a pouch that prevented use. If you really need it, there would be "stations" available where the pouch c
345.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
I did a two year technical program, it was called "Information Systems and Data Processing"; this was maybe two or three years before this book was published ('94-'96 maybe?). It wasn't an apprentice program but all
346.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
As they mentioned, this is what the AGPL license is for. No one is suggesting that the people at HashiCorp should not be paid for their work. https://fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-agp...
347.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
Rich presented Clojure to our local software development group in 2008, I've been working with Clojure (both as a hobbyist and eventually professionally) ever since. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGVqrGmwOAw At that
348.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
Perhaps this project will spend it's funding on a fork of Gimp that is more similar to the Photoshop UI and closes some of the gap in features.
349.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
I'm having trouble finding coverage in this, but I believe the current state is that the warrant can require you to unlock the phone but you don't have to tell them how or provide your password. https://www.forbes.com&#
350.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
In my opinion, the comparison to weaponry is pretty loaded and unreasonable. It evokes scenes of mass shootings, secure communication has no similar destructive power. Warrants are still a thing! The government in the US can still get a war
351.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
That is a good point. It's also possible that Apple has made some kind of concession but has found a weasel-y way to do it that let's them feel like they can claim no concessions have been made. Maybe the difference is that Apple
352.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
Apple claims that messages sent with their Messages application are end-to-end encrypted, even in China, and that they have made no concessions to government of China. But... Everyone in China has their iCloud backups stored in China and Ap
353.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
My understanding is that there will be a new authority, Ofcom, that will regulate the community of messaging application vendors. One of there powers will be to enforce the scanning of messages for CSAM or terrorism related content and Ofco
354.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
Because it is very easy for them to break down the door, or smash a nearby window, or simply wait for someone to go in or out and demand entry.
355.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
An insidious part of this discussion is this idea that these laws do not interfere with encryption. IMHO, it's a dishonest stance to take but when debated, the first thing defenders of this legislation say is that this "does nothi
356.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
There's also this "enrolment cliff" the universities have been worried about for a long time. Apparently the pool of students is itself shrinking. https://web.archive.org/web/20230315152647/https:&#x
357.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
The marketing around this issue is problematic and it's keeping people from clearly discussing the issues. The authors of the UK bill chose to focus on CSAM _specifically_ so that they could hamstring the debate. That so much of the in
358.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
This idea that because a human is sometimes wrong, it's okay for the chatbot to be wrong is one I find to be dangerous and unhelpful. The fact that people are fallible shouldn't encourage us to choose solutions with a high or unpr
359.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
Don't be distracted by today's excitement over chatbots. Companies are out there consolidating this data right now through traditional methods. Oracle, for example, has been saying the quiet part out loud. https://www.f
360.
▲
by
cmiles74
3y ago
Real solutions are the enemy of random bullshit. A chatbot that we know will misdiagnose is of no use to anyone.
More ›