cm3

66 ms·

721.
by cm3 10y ago
Can you point me to a source? I've read conflicting articles on it and frankly I found it odd that they supposedly would layer ZFS-like features on top of NTFS.
722.
by cm3 10y ago
Ogg containers have this problem that to change the metadata you have to rewrite the whole file whereas with ID3 it's always the last bytes at the end and highly efficient to edit.
723.
Lenovo suggests removal of bundled app as a security fix(support.lenovo.com)
5 points by cm3 10y ago|0 comments
724.
by cm3 10y ago
And from what I understand ReFS is also implemented on top of NTFS, but this time it's real, shipped code and meant to provide some of the features found in ZFS to Windows users.
725.
by cm3 10y ago
Thanks.
726.
by cm3 10y ago
And even if you're at a desk with a permanent internet connection, the server roundtrip is never as fast as local disk access. Having fast access to history is something I don't want to miss. On top of that, having it all locally
727.
by cm3 10y ago
Do you have a link to the keynote video?
728.
by cm3 10y ago
Sounds like a rewarding game, actually, and might appeal to instincts. Not a bad idea in certain applications.
729.
by cm3 10y ago
It's probably more due to having many large product groups (or subsystem groups) that don't cooperate as closely as one would like them to. For example NTFS doesn't have a 260 limit but the userland above and therefore the AP
730.
by cm3 10y ago
More info: https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9175219&cid=522154... https://github.com/dotnet/apireviews/tree/master/2015-08-26-... http://mspoweruser.com/ntfs
731.
by cm3 10y ago
This sounds reasonable. Case in point are other features which required a manifest with the right entries.
732.
by cm3 10y ago
Given how drastically Microsoft changed in the last couple years, I wouldn't be surprised if they distanced themselves from the level of compatibility guarantees they issued in the past. EDIT: I don't think it would go down well,
733.
by cm3 10y ago
It makes sense for this be opt-in, but I'd like to know how they want to achieve compatibility with apps that didn't adapt and are given such a file.
734.
by cm3 10y ago
Interesting. Snapchat sounds a lot more complex than I had envisioned from hearing about it.
735.
by cm3 10y ago
I've never seen Snapchat, but that description seems to contradict the sibling saying it can be text only too.
736.
by cm3 10y ago
Don't forget that there's a vast number of African Americans who do not condone the use of the n word freely and for fun as it happens these days. I believe their main objection is that it takes away from the meaning and history a
737.
by cm3 10y ago
As in paper.
738.
by cm3 10y ago
Isn't snapchat video only?
739.
by cm3 10y ago
If it confuses users who don't understand why it's different for their friends, it can be perceived as such.
740.
by cm3 10y ago
Out of curiosity I just tried and it never fully loaded and with NoScript and such it didn't work for me. Is it supposed to work in the default config with NoScript and via Tor?
741.
by cm3 10y ago
Wayland and Weston work and there's also non-Weston compositors (window managers) like sway, kwin, gnome and more that actually work decently enough with Xwayland integration for running legacy (X11) apps.
742.
by cm3 10y ago
Is it possible to use recaptcha in tor browser bundle? I heard that the new picture selection variant broke totally for tor browser users. EDIT: what's /s
743.
by cm3 10y ago
> It takes time to solve a captcha regardless of whether or not it's going to /dev/null or into some neural network. Yes, and if Google's captcha didn't get much harder, I wouldn't mention it. At least they
744.
by cm3 10y ago
The general idea of a captcha is valid and sound, but it's a problem if captchas turn into crowdsourced labor for Google's neural net. First it was reading house numbers, which was easy and not that time intensive, thus acceptable
745.
by cm3 10y ago
Hadn't seen that before. But there's one disadvantage with breaking captchas: have you been challenged recently with Google captchas? They take much, much longer to solve and oftentimes you don't even pass. This is with their
746.
by cm3 10y ago
> Android notifications do not require any app to be running in order for them to be displayed. I didn't say there has to be. What I said is there's a single notification service which is reused by everyone. If you're say
747.
by cm3 10y ago
Most users don't care because there is no way and they're not technically minded enough to complain about it. They would use it if available. I can cite many examples of non-technical users who had conversations like "do you
748.
by cm3 10y ago
That makes more sense, thanks. Re sharing contacts by replacing User@Domain with numbers: Yes, this solves some of it because everyone agreed to use phone numbers, but phone numbers are a thing of the past and you don't always want to
749.
by cm3 10y ago
> It already happened for personal correspondence (facebook) and I'm sure at some point it'll happen for work correspondence too. I don't know the numbers but I'm part of the population that never used Facebook, so I&
750.
by cm3 10y ago
Also with a phone it's kinda bad if you want to use it for communication right now and have to take the risk and wait of applying the update.

More ›