Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
clubm8
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
121.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Is it paywalled? Maybe your exit node was used to scrape? I don't read NYT much but when I've checked out the .onion such as today I've had no issue reading articles.
122.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
My pet theory is that these DDOS attacks are not just other merchants. I believe state actors are DDOSing to force traffic through nodes they control to deanonymize traffic.
123.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
>they have "Bible" in their museum name, and that gets all the bigots out in arms. Your post admits they broke the law. It's not bigoted to insist rich, religious people follow the low. The opposite in fact: it's the
124.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
I had not tried in a long time. They have for a long time not allowed you to put airport into monitor mode easily, so I always just bought a USB wifi antenna for any wireless penetration testing. I'm surprised by this thought... is it
125.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Interesting... or a simpler method is to always use a VPN. Or will the resolver somehow see the original IP?
126.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Ok but if I don't want to use DOH then what? I'd previously used Cloudflare's DNS because I trusted it more than my ISP. Is disabling DoH going to enhance my privacy? What action items can I take away from this article? I see
127.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Control is a strong word. I think from my reading, they have journalists willing to listen who don't have the skills (or inclination) to sniff bs. The article seems to not differentiate between SSL and TLS for example, mentioning peopl
128.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
>Given Bloomberg's bad track record on infosec stories I say I have my doubts. This is all speculation: I've noticed a weird amount of ex-CIA find their way to that publication. I sometimes wonder if the China story was some ki
129.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Hi reporter on this story: Are we aware if these are targeted (~60 orders = ~60 targets) or requests for large swathes of information?
130.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Why would someone want to shoot a particle accelerator into the sky? (The article mentions plasma balls, but as a non physicist I wonder still "Why?") The US military probably does not want plasma balls because they look pretty.
131.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
I'm surprised FR, DE and ES can restrict the use of the card in the rest of the EU.
132.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
not really sure what your point is so maybe you can clarify: are you saying it's ok to have a separate type of warrant for terrorists? "traditional warrant system" is not a legal term. FISA warrants are warrants. Highly probl
133.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Design doesn't have to mean lots of color or weird use of white space though. One can "design" a great resumé in LaTeX.
134.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
>We already have a warrant system in place that is more than adequate for protecting privacy and excessive dragnet fishing expeditions. Do you have a citation for that claim? There are vast[1] systems in place that violate laws and norms
135.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
I see several people discussing VPNs in the comments, but I'm surprised no one is mentioning Tor. Is Tor identified and blocked reliably by the great firewall, even with bridges? (The Tor UI claims meek-azure works in China, is this no
136.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
>Timing of his death and Satoshi's silence seems too coincidental But does that mean he singularly created, or that some secret sharing scheme won't unlock the credentials without all inventors?
137.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
> I thought everything pointed to Paul Le Roux being Satoshi? I guess if a criminal is going to write their own encryption software (Truecrypt) it's not out of the realm of possibility they'd also create their own currency...
138.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Why do we think Satoshi is a singular person? My pet theory is "Satoshi" was multiple people. IIRC there was even speculation about one programmer who sadly passed away shortly after Bitcoin's launch. If someone(s) used some
139.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
I suspect these things rely on the device not being powered up when seized.
140.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
I suspect any modified hardware would be targeted, not every single computer. You probably shouldn't order a computer online if this is your threat model, and instead pay for one off the shelf.
141.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Operations focused could be good. Some of the older iPhones are better IMHO. Small enough to use 1 handed, headphone port, battery could be improved while keeping form factor. An operations person would see that as a market that will migrat
142.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Maybe not :-) https://github.com/psal/anonymouth
143.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
This is super interesting, brings back memories. We take for granted how easy anonymity is in age when anyone can spoof their MAC address at a public wifi point and be fairly anonymous. Question: Is there a technical reason the author does
144.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
What are you on about? You can totally text someone to "come over and play some Xbox" or some other generic term just as much as they can say "come grab a pint" over a landline.
145.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
A rise in cell phones coupled with a decrease in cash (more and more CC usage) making robbery less profitable while penalties stayed the same makes intuitive sense.
146.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
People have been fired for being gay, does that mean there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the bedroom?
147.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Is the issue Tor traffic, or that you know what traffic is Tor? There are many types of "abuse" (not just trolling) - mass downloading/scanning. (Ex: several types of port scanning can't be done via Tor since it doesn&
148.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
Interesting considering China blocked them at one point https://thenextweb.com/asia/2013/01/21/the-chinese-governmen...
149.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
I suspect it's not as linear as that. I never tried pot in my youth because it was "bad" - an illegal drug, like heroin or meth. Conversely some people may try pot or mushrooms and assume that ALL drugs are not as dangerous a
150.
▲
by
clubm8
7y ago
This seems like a false sense of safety. With weed if it's the lowest priority they will ignore the smell/reports of the smell. With mushrooms they'll find them incident to arrest and thus probably tack on a charge to whateve
More ›