cloudsinthesky

5 ms·

1.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> The migrant caravans are obviously intending to violate US law by entering the country illegally. Citation need. I think it is the exact opposite situation, so regardless of the final truth, it's clearly not obvious that the peo
2.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> Republicans can only remain in power if people continue to vote them into office That's not true. People voted them out in 2016 but their votes were not counted, or their registrations were falsely and illegally cancelled, etc.
3.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> not unreasonable to ask for information It is unreasonable to state that being asked for information is the exact same thing as being accused of a crime and found guilty . OP comment stated unequivocally that these journalists are c
4.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> not to release the documents I'm quite certain the crime here would be releasing these documents and doxxing innocent people who are doing their normal, okay, not-illegal jobs.
5.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> The migrant caravan is very obviously being accused of breaking the law By whom? I've never heard this! > (at a minimum, conspiracy to commit a crime) What crime? What are you talking about? > Is this hard to grasp? Yes, bec
6.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
I think some news articles mentioned that test drives are over? Maybe that was a mistake? I think that Tesla will remove the Schedule a Test Drive link soon? Maybe I'm wrong.
7.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
Buying a car and returning it is not the same as going on a test drive. Pretending it is the same thing is just ridiculous and super out-of-touch with the target audience of the lower-cost cars.
8.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> without even being able to try the product? People can still try it, just not for free and from Tesla. I test drove a Model S P90 in 2012 from the store in Toronto and it changed my life. I can't afford the car, but it was an incr
9.
Republicans launch propaganda sites designed to look like local news outlets(salon.com)
19 points by cloudsinthesky 8y ago|0 comments
10.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
Article discusses the differences in measuring what a user counts as, so the numbers are difficult to pin down exactly. Anecdotally, I still _have_ my account, but no longer log in. It has been 2-3 months now, so I ought to be counted as su
11.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
Are you now the CEO of a publicly traded company, making statements about privacy directly to the people you insulted previously, without even addressing the horrible insults you stated previously? > There has to be a statute of limita
12.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> No one cares who you are, they are just trying to sell ad space. That's not true at all. GP comment referenced the fact that foreign companies get the data and then manipulate public opinion by spreading lies in a targeted manner,
13.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> But, I think you're overestimating people's capacity to care about issues that will have no real consequence on their life. Why do you think that this has no real consequence on their lives? I would state unequivocally that p
14.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> there's a bug in that procedure Are you sure? I don't think there is! > Before he signed the act, digitally signing wasn't legal, Is that true? I think this is the source of error here. In your quote citation (the ful
15.
by cloudsinthesky 8y ago
> The unfortunate explanation for the phenomena that you're observing is that most people simply don't care about their privacy -- at least not nearly as much as you do. I don't think that is a fair assessment. Even if tha