cloudfudge

9 ms·

31.
by cloudfudge 5mo ago
> that also compiles to a binary "compiles to a binary" is not a useful criterion. The criterion Go is winning on is "compiles to a single, completely self-contained binary," meaning it does not depend on libc or any
32.
by cloudfudge 5mo ago
"Attempting" is not in any way a valid description of what he's doing there. That was a wild clip.
33.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
"Requiring something be allowed" != "requiring them to have them"
34.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
> The consequence of saying they cannot choice to not have them. Is saying your requiring them to have them whether or not the people their want them. Sorry, but this is nonsense. They are currently not banned in Maine, yet they do not
35.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
I can prove everyone doesn't love hyberbole because I have found a counterexample, but I cannot prove everyone doesn't use Rectangle.app.
36.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
In what universe is requiring them the only alternative to banning them? The actual alternative is obvious: not banning them.
37.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
As someone who's really into music theory, I am always annoyed by what I perceive as a patronizing faux exaltation of it supposedly being mathematically based. It's not math; it's cyclical patterns. Yes, it can all be repre
38.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
I would love to see the effect of the mirror's effect on the motion of the camera in a weightless environment. I bet it's enough to measurably affect the picture, especially on a long exposure. Net torque of it opening and then
39.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
Oracle Cloud isn't actually "terrible cloud", but it definitely isn't geared toward smaller users like startups and individuals. It's downright hostile to casual use. But for fortune 500 companies who don't m
40.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
The focus not being the DB for 20 years is mostly true, with the exception that all of their applications are well-served by having a very scalable and very bulletproof database in-house.
41.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
> Here are some completely normal and plausible [reasons]. It was worked on over weeks internally, commits referenced other internal NVIDIA software/libraries they used. It name dropped projects and code names. Maybe it was just an
42.
by cloudfudge 6mo ago
> there's overwhelming evidence that their public github history is accurate and Nemoclaw was written in a weekend Aside from commits on github, which we've already established mean absolutely nothing, what is the overwhelming
43.
by cloudfudge 7mo ago
I don't have to know their reasoning in order to know public github history is not necessarily an accurate record of all changes.
44.
by cloudfudge 7mo ago
Just let go of the notion that a 4 day github history necessarily means the project is only 4 days old. It's a ridiculous assumption to base an argument off of. It's extremely normal to have work in one, perhaps internal, repo w
45.
by cloudfudge 7mo ago
I got a new Maverick last year for $24.5k.
46.
by cloudfudge 7mo ago
What is this "security through obscurity" you're talking about? We're talking about running linux in a VM running in a browser. That has just as much attack surface (and in some ways, more) as running linux in a hyperv
47.
by cloudfudge 7mo ago
GP says "You don't want to just run that code in ... even a very well protected VM." Why?
48.
by cloudfudge 7mo ago
I just had a conversation with gemini where I asked it to analyze my style and one of the things it claimed was that I referred to things as "AI slop" and "brainrot", both of which are terms I haven't ever used. I
49.
by cloudfudge 7mo ago
I'd probably go for "the device explicitly allowed itself to be ID'd by intentionally broadcasting a signal intended for this purpose."
50.
by cloudfudge 7mo ago
"too many lines of bash" and "lines of code" seem like very strange metrics to use to form these types of opinions.
51.
by cloudfudge 8mo ago
It's arguable that their average speed must be ever so slightly higher than yours if they passed you. ;)
52.
by cloudfudge 8mo ago
Also, it really doesn't happen that often. I'm that guy following at 3 or 4 car lengths in rush hour traffic and people aren't constantly funneling in front of me. It's a hypothetical "problem" that is bigger
53.
by cloudfudge 8mo ago
What if every installed twitter app just acted as a proxy for grok to post as millions of different elon stans? Diabolical.
54.
by cloudfudge 8mo ago
Well, one car is... and it's a Tesla!
55.
by cloudfudge 8mo ago
It ran for a while when I gave it instructions to do a depth-first search of the known map, while observing any atypical features of every new location and also picking up anything of note. A few times, it asked me if I wanted to continue
56.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
I think if you actually tried to build this, you'd find that highly sensitive strain gauges are not sufficient. The human hand is extremely sensitive, and for example can detect tiny clicks and vibrations that you're not going to
57.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
And yet it still isn't any more interesting to argue about.
58.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
I think the biggest problem is that the amount of tension you need to apply to hold the binding pins can vary quite a bit, and it's hard to build a mechanical device that can feel with enough fidelity to figure it out.
59.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
If I never hear nerds bicker over the various meanings of the word 'hacker' again, it will be too soon.
60.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
Wow, that really puts things in perspective. Phil, based on this summary and reading the emails about what went down between you and Nick, you sound like an absolute lunatic. He mocked you once back in 2017. He set up a satirical website

More ›