cloudfudge

6 ms·

61.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
Turning this thread into a weird anti-NYC rant is certainly a choice.
62.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
It's less that there is something unreasonable sounding about it and more that there's almost nothing that sounds reasonable about it. It's like you suggested that instead of setting speed limits, we directly tie the maximum
63.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
> That's bad because if someone got a hold of the records from both the site and the identity provider they might be able to match access time logs and figure out who you are I see your point, but this doesn't sound like an act
64.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
To be blunt, because it sounds insane and simultaneously solving the problem at the wrong abstraction level, and based on criteria that have nothing to do with age. Age-based IP ranges? This sounds like a recipe for reinventing the entire
65.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
mTLS is no good because the target service could then uniquely identify you. I think you explicitly want a three-party scheme where the target service just accepts the idp's assertion about your age in a cryptographically secure way.
66.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
That's quite an elaborate system. It goes through a lot of gyrations (not the least of which is inventing a whole new type of crime and passing laws about it) and doesn't sound even as strong as the age verification "require
67.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
I was thinking someone like Auth0 might want to offer it. They are not in the business of invasive user tracking but are in the business of trust.
68.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
This makes me wonder if there's a business case for a privacy-preserving identity service which does age verification. Say you have a strong identity provider that you have proven your age to. Just as the 3rd party site could use SSO
69.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
> Surely Jesus understands nuance Megachurch culture would like a word
70.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
The way I read his statement was as a joke. He wasn't a dumb guy. Surely he would have had the thought that if God is all-knowing, you obviously can't "fool" God by simply mouthing the right words right before you die.
71.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
I suspect this tendency is not correlated to political leaning in any way, and the suggestion that it is says more about how you want to perceive people of a particular leaning than anything about them.
72.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
If not, congratulations on the heist.
73.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
smeeagain2 says: > Maybe the AdaFruit founder said something unacceptable like "it's OK to be white" or "a man can't become an actual woman just by pretending that he is." That might explain the conflict. Wh
74.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
"Men are nice to you because of sex," is not an argument that women have it easy compared to men. It's another joke about men being idiots.
75.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
This is a fascinating development. Did he talk about this regularly?
76.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
The joke is that the guys are idiots about women. This isn't misogyny.
77.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
"Now shipping?" I do not see evidence of that. I am not even convinced the one you can test ride has this battery tech. They announced this same bike at least a year ago with regular LIon batteries.
78.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
Or maybe swags since this is vapor. I look forward to finding out.
79.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
Yes, when I see hubless wheels, my immediate thought is, "why did they spend engineering time on this when their goal was completely unrelated to it?" It makes me think they needed a smokescreen.
80.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
From the donutlab page: > It can be charged to full in just five minutes without limiting charging to 80%, and supports full discharge safely, repeatedly, and reliably. From the motorcycle youtube video[1]: > delivers up to
81.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
Neat. I like that multiple clients get the same websocket data, as opposed to each just running their own simulation. I will be watching https://lotteryeverysecond.lffl.me/wins with interest. ;)
82.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
> The above comment said that you’re a minority If we're going to pick nits, no it didn't. And the fact that I'm in a minority (which I definitely am) is what's irrelevant. The comment seemed to be doubting the exis
83.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
The security, performance, usability and reliability of wired headphones will always be superior to wireless. There is just no substitute for the simplicity of an uninterrupted piece of copper carrying an analog signal. The convenience o
84.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
"Just use wifi for headphones" and "One less thing to worry about" These are not compatible statements. :)
85.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
I didn't see a summary in here so based on my reading: * Certain headset devices from varying vendors have crappy BT security over both bluetooth classic and BLE * They implement a custom protocol called RACE which can do certain
86.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
It isn't about trust. There's no need to trust Kamala Harris in order to heed "wireless headphones probably have a legitimate security risk." And we know that even if she's a complete moron in this topic area, s
87.
by cloudfudge 9mo ago
The part that is counterintuitive to most people when it comes to the "server" terminology is that, with X, your end-user workstation (which may be an incredibly dumb X terminal) is the "display server", which means you
88.
by cloudfudge 10mo ago
You're making the same point as the person you're responding to. They're saying seniors are allowed to ask dumb questions. It's junior who are often afraid to do so.
89.
by cloudfudge 10mo ago
It's rust compiled to wasm. Dude's got a lot of interesting stuff on his projects page: https://mikail-khan.com/portfolio
90.
by cloudfudge 10mo ago
On the other hand, if you are communicating with a bunch of people who share that primary domain, it can be a useful way of making a point. (unless that primary domain tends to attract a lot of people who tend to the hyper-literal /s)

More ›