Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
closewith
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
Profits from property sales are often tax as CGT. It's only a select few jurisdictions that don't tax property sales, often with both CGTs and stamp duties. The difference in how their taxed in the US is certainly not standard glo
62.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
It's a solution to the problem raised by the GP - how to fairly value IP. This whole thread is about how many countries with land taxes don't similarly tax other assets like IP. Whether you think it's fair or not is another q
63.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
There are some analogues of a land tax in the UK. Council tax for residential property, rates for businesses, and the upcoming mansion tax.
64.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
This is actually a solved problem. It is self-assessed valuation with compulsory sale at declared value, known as the Harberger Tax.
65.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
Losing your temper when a serious boundary has been crossed is natural and expected. It had a positive outcome in that it stopped your bad behaviour immediately. > He ended up grabbing me by the throat, while no-one around did a thing to
66.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
> Yeah, you see, I don’t think you’ve quite understood the art of talking to anyone. Well, mastering the art of talking to anyone involves being able to initiate a conversation with people of many cultures, in many mental states, in many
67.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
Involving yourself by commenting on very personal matters, especially in a smug or condescending manner, is almost guaranteed to end badly.
68.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
> It can make for some very exhausting interactions if the bulk of your relationships are like this. Yes, agreed, and they weren't friendships to begin with. The OP just didn't recognise that. > OP's approach might not
69.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
Okay, I think some significant self-reflection is in order here. > There are counter examples like I mentioned above but they are rare. Those counter examples you mention also behave this way (and you likely do too), it's just they
70.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
Fair enough. > Somehow the relationship between me and them formed into one where they were expecting me to arrange and include them everytime without offering help or asking me in return. That is signal. They were communicating.
71.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
Yeah, agreed! It is selecting for a certain type. Just don't want the GP to fall into the trap that the others were clueless as they commented, because that normally indicates a blindspot on the GP's side, not the people with whom
72.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
> I agree :D. It's my best formulation to be explicit so far. How would you say it in more natural way to still achieve the same end result? I think you can't ask it, at least not without self-selecting yourself out of further
73.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
> That's really the key, right there. The value disappeared because of concern, not of anything real. The value also only existed in the first place because of belief, in future work, operations, profits, etc. Like it or not, confid
74.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
You must be very young? These issues predate 2010 by millennia.
75.
▲
by
closewith
7mo ago
All those behaviours are consequences of direct civil disobedience, unrest and rebellion - not alternatives.
76.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
The PDF you shared actually agrees with my point if you care you to read it. It models the cost for a specific HVDC implementation, but the HVDC line selected is more expensive when transporting just 3% of the energy of the pipeline. The sa
77.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
Capex for H2 pipelines is higher than new HVDC, and opex is 5-10x HVDC per MWh-km so you're just wrong on this. H2 makes sense for feedstocks but not energy distribution.
78.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
You are simply wrong on this. HVDC losses total ~5% for 1,000km, including step up and step down losses. H2 will experience 20-30% over the same distance of natural gas line including compression and friction losses. DOA.
79.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
It does, definitively.
80.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
No air compressor can compress hydrogen, nowhere near the necessary tip velocity.
81.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
All between co-located industrial generators and consumers. H2 pipelines are DOA due to the absurd compression costs.
82.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
Yeah, Li-ion batteries already have comparable life cycles to hydrogen tanks 1-2k fills/recharges, _but_ batteries are improving rapidly and tanks are already a mature technology.
83.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
GDPR doesn't have any minimum size before applying. There's a household exemption for personal use, but if you have one external user, you're regulated.
84.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
Centralised billing effectively makes serious journalism impossible. Omnibus subscription services will ruthlessly cut anything that affects the bottom line, and effective journalism is necessarily unpopular.
85.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
And much harder to repair.
86.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
You can mock their API all you want for development and there are many pre-built options for that, but it you want to touch their systems, they're sending a very clear signal. You must be a corporate with an RBO. Seems prudent to me.
87.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
> Blocking access to the information is the wrong way to deal with this problem. That's an assertion, but what's your reasoning? > This would be a perfect example of something which should be made open after a delay. If the
88.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
> Id say 80% of people are julius and if u dont think so then i have some news for you. > Industry is no different. Based on these comments, maybe some self-reflection is in order, as it seems from the 80% comment that what you mean
89.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
The lesson here is to make something people want. All else is forgiven is the product is something people really want - the product market fit most of us never achieve.
90.
▲
by
closewith
8mo ago
There definitely isn't overwhelming consensus the above figure suggests, as the public consultations always heavily lean towards interested parties (I didn't learn of the consultation until after it closed), but any topic that sha
More ›