clnq

30 ms·

331.
by clnq 3y ago
Two things: 1. Lots of drinks come in metal cans with BPA lining on the inside. 2. You can absolutely be reasonably healthy and drink some of these drinks, including the variants that are not sugar-free. I don’t think most people try to be
332.
by clnq 3y ago
Coca-Cola cans, and probably many others, have plastic coating with BPA on the inside. But that doesn’t matter much in comparison, because PFAS (corrected) are in the product, allegedly: https://amp.theguardian.com/environme
333.
by clnq 3y ago
What a snobby op-ed.
334.
by clnq 3y ago
UBI will just cause inflation so that you have to work to afford things again. No company will forgo an opportunity to raise prices when they can. Fiduciary responsibility to corporate boards has always been more important than morals or et
335.
by clnq 3y ago
I don’t see how investors would not demand price raises in any retail company in a UBI market. Especially for inelastic demand goods. I think that’s why UBI is dangerous. Because if anyone for some reason ceases to receive it after the pric
336.
by clnq 3y ago
Is this just in your company or statutory somewhere?
337.
by clnq 3y ago
2-3 days a year. Reasons are already discussed in many other comments and threads.
338.
by clnq 3y ago
2 to 4 weeks isn’t normal?
339.
by clnq 3y ago
Like a safety razor, which is much less safe than modern alternatives.
340.
by clnq 3y ago
I don’t think the tool by which a derivative work is created matters. The author should not distribute, remix, re-work, adapt, release, perform or synchronise it if they do not have the rights. This is already the case for all other technol
341.
by clnq 3y ago
Justice itself is worth a lot to us. It's an important value. We want justice in our lives and in our society. People will sometimes sue others when a potential remedy doesn't cover the costs. And society will permit certain indiv
342.
by clnq 3y ago
Also, the question of who should have kids and under what circumstances has been a matter of debate for centuries. There are so many strong, different opinions that whatever one says will probably insult someone else. I do not believe there
343.
by clnq 3y ago
Yeah, that's the image of herself she's been trying to paint recently, with the help of some media outlets[1]. In the same article, she and the author also claim that what she did was influenced by the world putting good women lik
344.
by clnq 3y ago
The same way they fit into all professions demanding accountability and precision - they can be used for exploration but everything they say should be verified.
345.
by clnq 3y ago
Human use of AI is an insult to humanity. But that's a human problem, not a problem of the AI technology.
346.
by clnq 3y ago
Most governments have been disseminating the information in many other media channels along with the internet. Aside from one or two beneficial articles I read about COVID-19 on the web, I don't think I have received any crucial inform
347.
by clnq 3y ago
In retrospective, the internet has done a lot to stifle human progress or thriving through proliferation of extremist ideas and overwhelming addictiveness. Just take the recent events alone - COVID-19 would not have been as much of a threat
348.
by clnq 3y ago
> similar hysteria when the calculator https://twitter.com/mrgreen/status/1640075654417862657
349.
by clnq 3y ago
There will always be enough academics to sign anything even marginally notorious.
350.
by clnq 3y ago
I mean... due process, by definition, is process that is due. Due process exists in the legal context (especially judicial), but also ethical/moral. Different schools of ethics have a lot to say about ethical due process before deprivi
351.
by clnq 3y ago
Inverse captchas or honeypots are a great idea. Just make a HTML input box with id=captcha, and hide it in some unconventional way in CSS so real users do not see it. If a bot was not deterred by seeing a captcha (a possibility), they would
352.
by clnq 3y ago
I think you have clashing perspectives, but I don't think they are joking. Both are good and interesting points of view, thank you for sharing.
353.
by clnq 3y ago
As a millennial, I cannot comprehend how 39% of people could have kids at 25. In between the financial crises, pandemics, and grinding hard to some day afford something meaningful. like actually appealing real estate, I am not close to havi
354.
by clnq 3y ago
I think just having to watch a significant portion of the video before you can leave a like or a dislike would have largely mitigated the brigading issue. Besides, it would have made the reviews more thoughtful overall. Maybe removing the d
355.
by clnq 3y ago
When you first use it, a dialog says “ChatGPT can provide inaccurate information about people, places, or facts.” The same is said right under the input window. In the blog post first announcing ChatGPT last year, the first limitation liste
356.
by clnq 3y ago
No dig intended.
357.
by clnq 3y ago
> What’s much harder though is actually getting it to double-down on fleshing those out. Now, it is. When ChatGPT first became public though, those were the Wild West days where you could get it to tell you anything, including all sorts
358.
by clnq 3y ago
Why not? They should use it, with sufficient understanding of what it is . Doctors should not use it to diagnose a patient, but could use it to get some additional ideas for a list of symptoms. Lawyers should obviously not write court docu
359.
by clnq 3y ago
We are all really stupid in a surprising number of ways. That's not all we are, but we are that, too.
360.
by clnq 3y ago
The very first limitation listed on the ChatGPT introduction post is about incorrect answers - https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt . This has not changed since ChatGPT was announced. OpenAI is advertising that it will gener

More ›