clipsy

5 ms·

1.
by clipsy 5d ago
Developing countries have done exactly that in many cases.
2.
by clipsy 6d ago
HN posters when the topic is DEI or Affirmative Action: I support pure meritocracy! HN posters when the topic is H1b visas or outsourcing: Meritocracy is horrible and I reject it!
3.
by clipsy 7d ago
Hilarious that you don't see the hypocrisy in your own post. I have plenty of judgment for Iran's regime, it's a pity you can't bring yourself to condemn child murderers who happen to be from your own country.
4.
by clipsy 7d ago
Whataboutism is a sign that you've lost the argument in the best of cases, but it's particularly disgusting to attempt to use it to distract from the blood of a hundred murdered children on your own country's hands. Two wrong
5.
by clipsy 7d ago
You're a couple decades late there, it was Clinton and the Third Way(tm) Democrats that abandoned blue collar workers. (Of course, that doesn't capture the full story either -- before '92, white blue collar workers were alrea
6.
by clipsy 8d ago
> I suspect that had it gone through the regular courts, Uber would have won. Based on what, exactly? Judging by the fact that Uber preemptively offered a $10m settlement, it seems like they did not exactly believe that they had a strong
7.
by clipsy 11d ago
I think people may disagree with you on what constitutes a tangential annoyance. Is there any point at which the format is, in fact, a legitimate annoyance?
8.
by clipsy 13d ago
It doesn't seem like you have anything to justify these (pretty extreme) claims, bluntly.
9.
by clipsy 13d ago
> Every other country, including most of Europe, has hammered out some kind of deal with America So did Canada, and Trump wiped his ass with the deal the moment he needed a distraction from another scandal. Canada is lucky to have leader
10.
by clipsy 13d ago
Why is it that you consider the possibility that Texas and Florida will "stop paying federal taxes" (how?), while omitting the possibility that California itself will do the same rather than defaulting?
11.
by clipsy 14d ago
> I cant even get it to work on pure science with Claude Have you tried asking your questions in Arabic? (Partially joking here, but partially serious as well -- I wonder how well these guardrails work against different languages)
12.
by clipsy 21d ago
Extremely tangential, but I would contend the headline should be "Is Fewer Children the Future?" (as painful as that sounds) because "Fewer Children" here is effectively a singular noun describing a demographic with fewe
13.
by clipsy 24d ago
I'm sure it varies from person to person, but I find it very frustrating to use Chrome's equivalent of the "Awesome Bar" when I'm forced to (eg work computer); Firefox just seems to do a much better job of surfacing
14.
by clipsy 25d ago
No, they do not: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2024/03/13/manifest-v3-manif...
15.
by clipsy 27d ago
Since live action results are acceptable, this is already possible with current day LLMs. Just instruct one to hire a writer, director, cast, and crew to make the movie. Plus, the token costs involved should be pretty low! (Other costs may
16.
by clipsy 1mo ago
I don't expect you to read everything, but your choice of what to call out is still telling. If you truly think this is the sort of comment that needs direct intervention, I'd politely suggest you should set aside 2-3 hours per we
17.
by clipsy 1mo ago
The "Gross." remark (Edit: now removed) at the end was unnecessary, but the bulk of the comment seems like a pretty legitimate question to me. It's telling that I see far worse HN comments on a daily basis that don't war
18.
by clipsy 1mo ago
Yeah but it could also have a bad outcome
19.
by clipsy 1mo ago
Here's ray-ban.com selling a variety of Ray-Ban branded Meta glasses: https://www.ray-ban.com/usa/ray-ban-meta-ai-glasses
20.
by clipsy 1mo ago
They're so furious they might even say some mean things on Twitter before they line up to vote straight ticket Republican again!
21.
by clipsy 1mo ago
We're going to build a wall and we're going to make them pay for it.
22.
by clipsy 1mo ago
I can't help but notice that you're still providing absolutely no evidence for an extraordinary claim.
23.
by clipsy 1mo ago
If you're seriously claiming black women didn't have the right to vote in 1976, you should probably provide some evidence rather than snide remarks.
24.
by clipsy 1mo ago
Why aren't you? If you believe that the people "running the show" are the most corrupt of all time (I think that's a stretch, though they're certainly the most corrupt in my lifetime), then it seems like you should
25.
by clipsy 1mo ago
Isn't that the supreme court's job?
26.
by clipsy 2mo ago
There is no “browser business,” because people are - with rare exceptions - unwilling to pay for a web browser. Even Firefox is ad-supported indirectly via its default search contract with google.
27.
by clipsy 2mo ago
That's not fair, there are also a lot of world leaders that pay lip service to concern about global warming while defending corporate interests at all costs!
28.
by clipsy 2mo ago
That's a great way to get access to them in 3-12 months.
29.
by clipsy 2mo ago
It isn't making mistakes that's a strength, it's the commitment to acknowledging and addressing mistakes.
30.
by clipsy 2mo ago
Well, surely Anthropic's executives should be charged under the CFAA[0] then, right? [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act

More ›