cliffrowley

3 ms·

1.
by cliffrowley 17y ago
I agree it isn't enough for all situations, but in those situations you're better off using a tool that is appropriate rather than shoe-horning a tool that isn't. Yes, IM is convenient, and if you are in a situation where you and the perso
2.
by cliffrowley 17y ago
This is exactly the approach we're going for. We're a distributed team and have been since the start, and over the past two years we've used a variety of weird and wonderful tools to enhance the communication between us. While video confer
3.
by cliffrowley 17y ago
We're working on a text tool right now. As for integration with webcams and such - being able to use Eye with your current tools is fundamental to the idea. We didn't want to reinvent the wheel and provide everything in 1 box. You should
4.
by cliffrowley 17y ago
Yep, that's coming very soon!
5.
by cliffrowley 17y ago
You did read the article, didn't you? ;-)
6.
by cliffrowley 17y ago
I think you've missed the point, It's not meant to be a netmeeting, or connect pro :-) In fact, it's not supposed to be a tool that you pre-prepare necessarily. As the article says, it's a tool that you can use impromptu: in an "oh ok, l
7.
by cliffrowley 17y ago
One of the things we've tried to do (and this should cover chaosmachine's comment too I hope) is make a tool that is instantly available. There's really no wait time involved - if I'm already on the phone with someone, I'm probably not goi
8.
by cliffrowley 17y ago
The sound you hear is actually just in the video, the client itself is silent (you'll be glad to hear!)