Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
clhodapp
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
331.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
It shouldn't, though, because there is no table bound to that name to draw from at that point. You haven't added a from-list that is actually relevant to the current scope yet.
332.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
How does that help at all, though? When it comes time to write the final select, you still haven't established the meanings of the things you are selecting from until you write the from and join clauses.
333.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Unfortunately, actual usability seems to be getting ignored in the rush for a "standard". In the meantime, you might want to consider using RAML. It compiles to OpenAPI and is far more optimized for use by humans instead of machin
334.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
That seems like a strange place to take a stand, since the specific brand of user hostility that pervades Windows 10 seems to have seen its origin in Windows 8
335.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
That's super fiddly though: you will be leaning on (anti) affinity and counts to retain the 1:1 relationship between hosts and pods. I would argue that daemonsets aren't for any specific workload, they're more about how you
336.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
At a high level, your use-case maps well to a Kubernetes DaemonSet, which is a resource that represents the desire to run a copy of something containerized on every node within your cluster. Kubernetes would give you some things that might
337.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
The [-] button is actually a handy thread-collapser. The downvote button is a mirror image of the upvote button and only shows if you have several hundred karma.
338.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Couldn't you achieve this with any font by rendering in higher resolution, downscaling to the size of the screen, and then having a "magnification" box follow your eyes around?
339.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
You are incorrect. They are going to begin charging a small fee for public IPs (i.e. IPs that can talk to the internet), not static IPs. They do support NAT as an alternative, but they charge for it (and are slightly lowering that cost as
340.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Ah well except it is literally called the "always free" tier so you would think that something as core as being connected to the internet would be, you know... free?
341.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
You aren't wrong but this is also you get users who think that Chrome uses all your RAM even if you have a huge amount...
342.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Sure. You can't easily replace the driver with a self-written, malicious driver without exploiting some sort of deep Windows vulnerability. However, executable code can perform all manner of mischief without being a driver. Anyway, I d
343.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
They do though: 1) They are distributing executables to their users over a MITM-able channel. That is not acceptable. 2) A bunch of their users will have a much tougher time downloading their drivers when Chrome stops supporting FTP.
344.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Alright. It's not encrypted and not origin-verifiable then. I think we all knew that though... anyway it should be abundantly clear at this point that no one should be using protocols that can trivially be MITM'ed to access any
345.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
The complaint seems to be about the duplicity, not the raw interest in investing.
346.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
What? Intel are currently in the midst of a massive ongoing supply shortage. Lack of ability to keep up with demand is at least as much an Intel problem as it is an AMD one at this point.
347.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
What? Intel have been slipping the ship date on their 10 nm process node for years . It's slipped so much that it's likely to not to even be fully released before it is discarded for its successor.
348.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
>Corporate IT groups typically don't treat their non-IT coworkers as customers. Instead, they treat them as adversaries and a nuisance. One deep problem with the "internal customer" model is that you don't get a large
349.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Oh nice!
350.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
You definitely don't need a predefined schema. You simply make it a responsibility of both the reader and the writer to keep track of what stringy keys have been seen and in what order. You can then refer back into that ordered list of
351.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Right. There is definitely a tradeoff between requiring retention of the identifiers, which requires keeping more state, and re-specifying them, which requires sending more data. There are definitely more sophisticated ways to handle this (
352.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
It seems like repeated keys would be super-easy to make more efficient in a binary format: You could write each key in stringish form once (the first time it was seen) and then refer to it with a numeric seen-key reference from there on.
353.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Ah, I can figure it out pretty easily for that example too but probably only because I am pretty familiar with variance and you chose really generous names. I personally find the reasoning about variance becomes a lot easier if you stop thi
354.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
I'm not really sure what you mean. Variance just changes what is and is not a subtype/supertype. If List is covariant then List<T> is a subtype of List<U> if T is a subtype of U. So then, by induction, List<List<
355.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Higher-kinded types. Generics that take generics as parameters. They allow things like writing a function that both takes and returns any container type you can map over with different (defined) element types. Given how hard arity-0 generic
356.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Gah. The metaphor of calling screen area "screen real estate" has always been a pet peeve of mine but this "20 vertical pixels of virtual real estate" has me simultaneously impressed and horrified. Why not just "2
357.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Sure. There is a subtle difference between "things that make employees happier also improve business performance" and "making employees happier improves business performance", but in both cases you generally want to do t
358.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
YAML (and TOML and even XML when it's being used in a tag-centric way instead of a text-centric way) are not markup languages. A markup language is one that allows you to assign meaningful annotations to regions within a chunk of textu
359.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
Maybe. Putting things into space creates a lot of air pollution.
360.
▲
by
clhodapp
7y ago
It seems to me that that is true, that it happened, and that it saw greatly varying levels of success for different use cases.
More ›