clessed

4 ms·

1.
by clessed 1y ago
Would you like to elaborate on your abusive comment? Doesn't really say much.
2.
by clessed 1y ago
If the policy of MIT or any other institution states that certain spaces are designated as single-sex only, then no, people of the opposite sex do not have the right to use these spaces. I don't expect people to have a problem with und
3.
by clessed 1y ago
Nonetheless, even in cases where someone has managed to somewhat disguise themselves as the opposite sex - or think they have done so - they will still be expected to respect boundaries, and stay out of spaces designated for the opposite se
4.
by clessed 1y ago
I see the Supreme Court ruling as striking just about the right balance in law. It affirms single-sex spaces as actually being single-sex, and confirms that both sex and "gender reassignment" are protected characteristics in the E
5.
by clessed 1y ago
Not really though. This is about female and male, not feminine and masculine. Like for example, women in prison won't have any problem if they don't look stereotypically feminine. But they certainly are under significant threat if
6.
by clessed 1y ago
But that report misses the point that women's rights to single-sex spaces is about boundaries, consent and protection from male presence in intimate settings. By only surveying "transgender experiences" it's basically ju
7.
by clessed 1y ago
What has led you to believe that?
8.
by clessed 1y ago
It was May's plan to introduce gender self-ID that galvanised such a strong and rapid response against it, largely coordinated on Mumsnet, within its Feminism and Women's Rights (FWR) subforum. In fact, the recent UK Supreme Court
9.
by clessed 1y ago
No bigotry here, just facts. Take your misogyny and your detachment from reality elsewhere. Thanks.
10.
by clessed 1y ago
My comment at the top of this thread got detached, but originally it was a reply to this misleading comment: > this is dope, made by an all female team. > hopefully the games industry gets more female led, minority led studios Can we
11.
by clessed 1y ago
[flagged]
12.
by clessed 2y ago
Neither of those policy positions are far right. Arguments for stricter controls on immigration are made from across the political spectrum. The left-wing view is mainly because the cheap labour migrants provide mean that not only are they