Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cle
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
391.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
Brave. (This question often leads to moving goalposts and quibbling over definitions of "useful innovations".)
392.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
> Except, of course, that specs are only tested correct, not proven correct like types would be. Yes this is the fundamental tradeoff. Specs et al are undoubtedly more flexible and expressive than static type systems, at the expense of s
393.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
> Probably what's holding it back the most, in my case, is that it doesn't have FUSE or it's own proper file browser. It does have FUSE: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/blob/master/docs&
394.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
There's nothing intrinsic about crons in the same container that prevent you from rescheduling containers on other nodes, fearlessly restarting, or whacking random containers. What they're doing, how they're handling state, a
395.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
> How does Docker handle asynchronous intermittent processes? Not good, actually. It is well known in Docker 101 that thou shall not run cron in the same container as the main process. You can run cron just fine in Docker containers. Whe
396.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I'm specifically talking about the subset of ways in which they are similar and also relevant to this scenario of handling arbitrary structured data like JSON. There are of course ways in which they are not similar, but I'm not su
397.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
Yes I'm aware that there are differences, but it's not clear to me how that's relevant.
398.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I'm not sure why you're being downvoted, the only alternatives I've seen are to use methods or enums, which constrain the types to those supported by JSON, but ultimately you still have to switch on the type at runtime, the t
399.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
The complaints in GitHub started rolling in on March 4. I found a few torrent clients that were added by Microsoft as PUA on March 2 (this is probably an incomplete list): - QBitTorrent: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/
400.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
Genuinely curious, do you know how police would respond in a country with stricter gun control, if you called in a report that someone was armed with assault rifles and bombs?
401.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
Tampa has that distinction for the same reason too. Afternoon thunderstorms can cause the temperature to drop sometimes by 20 F!
402.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I cooked in professional kitchens for years before becoming a software engineer. For me, the cumulative stress of the software industry is a lot higher. I can never quite "turn off" and in the long-run it's a lot harder for
403.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
In the past I've used RecordStream a lot. I don't really know Perl but recs is still damn useful. https://metacpan.org/pod/App::RecordStream https://tsibley.net/talks/julienne-data/s
404.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I've found it to be mixed, depending on the nature of the workload. Sometimes having GC can be faster, since allocations can be cheaper. But it will generally trade off higher memory utilization, and the behavior is harder to predict
405.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
For my teams it's always been a cultural thing. Whenever something comes up, someone (at first, probably you!) has to ask: "would a runbook have helped here?". If so, give the person time to write a quality runbook. Also when
406.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
It's an easy concept. A lot of people might not like it. But I would like it.
407.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I get there are a lot of people who care about that, and that "remove the incentives" might be unpalatable for them. But it's definitely desirable for me, because I don't enjoy chasing social statuses in a gaming univers
408.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I would hate playing a game like this.
409.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I used to love playing multiplayer FPS games, without worrying about collecting rare items or my global ranking, because they were fun (e.g. Quake 3). Yeah there's still a "local" ranking (within a game), but the incentive to
410.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
> I honestly don't know how multiplayer will even work in a year's time or maybe even less! It's easy, IMO: remove the incentives for cheating. If this is the only way forward, I might be more likely to actually participat
411.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
> owning land you can live off of is a protection against all form of “dooms-day” scenarios In doomsday scenarios I doubt people will respect ownership rights very much. In that scenario, "ownership" isn't as much of a pro
412.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
Yeah I agree that false positives are a risk with monitoring 4xx rate. I've never seen a satisfactory "bulletproof" way to monitor 4xx rate, it's inherently difficult and simultaneously important to monitor. It's ea
413.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
> Bad: HTTP 400 > On the other hand, HTTP 400 level errors mean the client screwed up. This is bad general advice. HTTP 4xx errors mean the client screwed up, OR you screwed up (a change that e.g. increases 404 rate due to eventual co
414.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
Framing it like this is unproductive IMO. There's merit to picking technologies that help you and your teammates grow as engineers. You can take it too far...we should accept that it's a messy process to find the balance that lets
415.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
> How do you teach someone to look at the problems first and then pick the tools? By understanding what the person cares about. Everyone knows "pick the right tool for the problem". Not everyone uses such a simple calculus beca
416.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
You can’t track all requests anyway, as they can be trivially tunneled through encrypted streams with bundled certs. This is the tradeoff of running arbitrary Turing-complete programs. If you don’t like what a program is doing, or that it d
417.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I think a blanket ban is just as rights-infringing, in that it removes the choice from people entirely. The real issue to me is that the market frameworks cannot handle these new technology-enabled network effects very well. Banning a manif
418.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I agree, the thought of hoards of developers sending their code to Microsoft (or AWS via CodeGuru) to train their proprietary semantic model is disturbing, because of the potential network effects. They suck right now and have a lot of prob
419.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
I'd speculate that "customer obsession" and "insist on the highest standards" are used to justify many decisions that are hard on employees. Now there is a counterbalance to those.
420.
▲
by
cle
5y ago
On the retail side, increasingly their most important customers appear to be advertisers and sellers buying "sponsored" slots, since that junk is about all I see on Amazon these days as a buyer.
More ›