2 ms·
Yeah I agree that false positives are a risk with monitoring 4xx rate. I've never seen a satisfactory "bulletproof" way to monitor 4xx rate, it's inherently dif
by cle 5y ago
Yeah I agree that false positives are a risk with monitoring 4xx rate. I've never seen a satisfactory "bulletproof" way to monitor 4xx rate, it's inherently difficult and simultaneously important to monitor.
It's easy in retrospect to say "oh that was a waste of time because it was just bots" but you don't know that until you investigate. I ask myself "if I see elevated 4xx's, at what point do I start to care if they're caused by a bug?" and set monitor thresholds somewhere around there.