cjbgkagh

9 ms·

121.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Neat, I see AOT, will this be able to target WASM? I’m guessing there will be a mode that doesn’t use reflection emit since AOT doesn’t support that? I would check myself but I’m away from my computer.
122.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
I have privileged access to information that I cannot share, I would rather keep my access than win some argument online.
123.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Lol, you convinced a LLM to agree with you. I use the Big5 as a way of communicating where there is a common reference and a large body of work. How people think they think and how they actually think are two different things, people are mu
124.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
It’s not just a donkey, it’s a donkeys ass.
125.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
The ‘let me google that for you’ is set to be replaced with ‘let me ask ChatGPT for you’.
126.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
I generally agree that humans and LLMs benefit similarly from programming language features. I would tweak that a bit and suggest that their ability floor is higher than the human lowest common denominator so I would skew towards the more a
127.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Post type check analyzers can work with more than just the type information, you can really do whatever you want at this stage. The normal highly optimized type checker handles the bulk of the checking and the post type check analyzers can
128.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
The same pre war consensus also thought that war with Russia was unthinkable, it is Russia that focused on artillery tactics so the two assumptions went hand in hand. It’s my opinion that artillery is out of date and by the end of the Ukrai
129.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
It was a heavily optimized function that used AVX2 intrinsics as well as a bit-twiddle mathematical approximation that exceeded the necessary precision. I wanted it rewritten for a bunch of other backends, it refused saying that its more na
130.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Do you have a standard and a body of work you can point to in an effort to aid with communication these thoughts to others? At the very least there should be a reversible projection to the Big 5 standard.
131.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Agreeable people are also the most suggestible in that they are the most likely to actually change their views. These traits share the same axis.
132.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Your point was that humans did not display such behavior even though it has been extensively studied and they do. There is plenty of evidence that highly agreeable people will agree with you on incorrect ideas and conspiracy theories. The n
133.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Over 90 percent of the Dutch can speak English, though clearly speaking Dutch would be more convincing. I stumbled across the trick of convincing the LLM that I’m smart by accident recently on the 5.4-Codex model. It was effective in gettin
134.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Agreeableness is a Big Five personality trait so a lot of the formal research into personalities uses it as one of the dimensions.
135.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Would be better to think of it as ‘agreeableness’ and agreeable people are more likely to shift their views to agree with those they are talking to.
136.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
I find the LLMs target their language to the audience, so instead you could say, “I am Dutch so give it to me straight.” In my usage the LLMs gives much smarter answers when I’ve been able to convince it that I am smart enough to hear them.
137.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Perhaps they can’t help themselves out of habit, it is their nature. The original red dog team that started azure is long gone and the general success of the cloud papers over all levels of incompetence so that the incompetence is now entre
138.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
They started with a hands off approach and then went hands on, I’m not sure but that ‘hands on’ timing is likely to happen shortly after the usual acquisition vesting period of 3 years when the old guard starts to leave.
139.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
This is like one of those eye tests where they switch between lenses narrowing in on the prescription. The question is really what shades of turquoise is more blue than green. I got 80 which is close enough, I think it’s really only the ext
140.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
The role is only ostensively fungible because the org acts like it is, to its detriment. Staff turnover is crazy expensive. It’s a lemon market with a power play dynamic, one of the main reasons I’m self employed.
141.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Poeple are not fungible, who’s to say that the individual replacing them is of equal value.
142.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
100% agree, but that is in contention with the desire to invent something new. As a separate discipline where the career trajectory is determined by peers the user becomes less important.
143.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
I don’t agree, but that’s design, people have different opinions. I actually like the Ribbon interface, would have liked it more if they added a search box to it as well but designers hate search boxes.
144.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
The Win8 and Metro design disaster is what happens when you give UX free rein, instead of focusing on users they try to start design trends to impress other UX / designers (essential for their career). I wonder how much of Apples desig
145.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
You seem to be stuck on this point. We agree that going by the 2017 diagnostic criteria for hEDS people are only diagnosed at a rate of 1/3100 to 1/5000. But I ask; * What’s the prevalence of HSD? * Is there a meaningful differenc
146.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
The prevalence of hEDS + HSD is widely accepted to be 1/500 in medical research, that's not controversial. The only thing slightly controversial about my position is that I think they are fundamentally they are the same thing, a d
147.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
I added the HSD to the hEDS and gave my reasons for doing so. The figure for hEDS+HSD (1). I'm not the only person to do this (2). The classification was made more strict in 2017 where only 15% of those previously diagnosed with hEDS m
148.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Turns out I have great cholesterol.
149.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
Though statistically if you’ve previously been told you have something psychosomatic the odds are pretty good that you have something on this list.
150.
by cjbgkagh 6mo ago
I’ve had mono but not Lyme. My initial symptoms predated mono and started from infancy - but I’m on the very severe end of the spectrum. Most people don’t get hit with it until their 20s and 30s. I think a lot of similar conditions have hED

More ›