citeguised

9 ms·

61.
Don’t think big. Pick a small topic for your creative project.(medium.com)
2 points by citeguised 10y ago|0 comments
62.
by citeguised 10y ago
You could of course. It's just easier to cut 50% for a couple of months than 10% for years because the results come faster, and so does the motivation to keep it up. Also, counting calories is not really an exact science, so you want
63.
by citeguised 10y ago
Yes, especially if you don't have a senior colleague where you work and there are no other developers who could review your code like in my case (sole Frontend-Dev amongst Java-EE-Devs).
64.
by citeguised 11y ago
For front-end & web-development, the weekly »Web Development Reading List« is pretty nice. https://wdrl.info/
65.
by citeguised 11y ago
8/10. Four Years ago (with 26, after studying Design) I started working as a front-end-developer, and two years ago started learning proper JS- and programming-skills. The work is mostly rewarding and the pay is much better than it w
66.
by citeguised 11y ago
Recently started to dive into FP and Haskell, and it's nice to see it used at this scale. If anyone is looking for a starting-point: I stumbled upon a great book: http://haskellbook.com/ It's still early-access, b
67.
by citeguised 11y ago
_Unless_ you are a perpetual motion machine!
68.
by citeguised 11y ago
Just out of interest: - Does the book claim that you can't get fat when you don't eat carbs? - Is there a main reason for calories-in-calories-out being "damaging" as it says on the back?
69.
by citeguised 11y ago
The Javascript-Courses by Anthony Alicea on Udemy are by far the best I ever spent money on in terms of learning to code. https://www.udemy.com/user/anthonypalicea/
70.
by citeguised 11y ago
At first I thought there couldn't be a solution, since both robots always do the same thing. You can imagine the "duh!" in my head after seeing the comments here…
71.
by citeguised 11y ago
Keeping a calorie deficit doesn't mean starving yourself. You need 3000 calories a day? Eat 2000, you'll lose about 1 kg in a week. At least it works for me and lots of other people I know. Sure it's hard to keep 2000 when yo
72.
by citeguised 11y ago
You are right, I think I confused the scientific Kinesiology with the esoteric one. http://skepdic.com/kinesiologist.html thanks for your comment! Unfortunately I can't edit the original post.
73.
by citeguised 11y ago
The explanation is that facts don't matter for some people.
74.
by citeguised 11y ago
Yes I had the same problems when I started counting calories. It's very hard of course, and if I stop keeping track there is also the danger of eating again like I always did, thus gaining back all the 20 kilos. The thinking poorly&#x2
75.
by citeguised 11y ago
> how much we eat is moderated by satiety mechanisms No, it's moderated by our fork. It also means being hungry a lot and keeping exact track of your calories, just like poor people need to track their expenses. (Been there done tha
76.
by citeguised 11y ago
> How we measure the calorific value of food doesn't seem to give us the number of calories a body can extract from food Of course not but if we stick to the maximum we still can use this value to calculate our intake when we try to
77.
by citeguised 11y ago
Oh, so the laws of physics changed? Wow! No but seriously, this is a terrible article. As soon as you read »…a professor of _kinesiology_ and health science…« you know the statements are coming from people who believe in esoteric pseudoscie
78.
by citeguised 11y ago
Thanks a lot!
79.
by citeguised 11y ago
Looks nice, but how do I install this?
80.
by citeguised 11y ago
Clickbait much?
81.
by citeguised 11y ago
Will try, thanks!
82.
by citeguised 11y ago
Thanks!
83.
by citeguised 11y ago
Could you paste the article on pastebin? I'm getting a paywall.