citation_needed

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by citation_needed 17y ago

   I'll bet you, it's the same people browsing this site as well. That I doubt. The discussions on here seem a tad more enlightened and articulate.
2. 2.▲
   by citation_needed 17y ago

   The tragedy is, to the people calling the shots (ie. the invading military or government), a foreign civilian's life would probably be worth far less than $100,000. As a previous comment notes, civilians killed are thought of as 'collateral
3. 3.▲
   by citation_needed 17y ago

   "While 14 al-Qaeda were killed, some 687 civilian deaths also occurred…" That is profoundly disturbing. How can governments justify the continued use of drones with statistics like that? There needs to be an ethical debate, yes, and urgentl
4. 4.▲
   by citation_needed 17y ago

   I use my iPod Touch's Notes app to jot down things I need to do, buy or remember. It's cumbersome, but since it's the device I carry around, it's the obvious choice.
5. 5.▲
   by citation_needed 17y ago

   On the contrary, more page views do lead to higher ad revenues. If Gawker is the second highest referrer, that means it's actually contributing to the revenue The Post earns by way of its website.