chvvel843

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by chvvel843 12y ago

   I am not trolling, but trying to lead a conversation based on arguments. You, on the other side, do not have any arguments... your only argument is that I am trolling. Look, check this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e
2. 2.▲
   by chvvel843 12y ago

   1. The OP stated that he is interested in what theoretical solutions there are + is it required to reach escape velocity. 2. You stated: >Yes, escape velocity is required. Mere position won't do it. > Remember that velocity is wh
3. 3.▲
   by chvvel843 12y ago

   I am not talking about sci-fi either ... only giving a simple example about how it actually works. Anyone with even basic knowledge in physics will know that you are wrong. Please research a little bit to see why you are wrong. An object ca
4. 4.▲
   by chvvel843 12y ago

   This is completely wrong. Escape velocity is the speed, which is required to break free of the gravitational pull, BUT in the case that no additional propulsion is available. In other words, you shoot an object with that speed from the sur
5. 5.▲
   by chvvel843 13y ago

   How is this different than say... http://www.dopdf.com/ ? This is really a crowded space with plenty of free alternatives that are quite easy to use and work flawlessly