chungy

35 ms·

481.
by chungy 3y ago
Indeed, I have strict mode enabled, uBlock Origin, containers, and the game works completely fine.
482.
by chungy 3y ago
I was using WebP-lossless for quite a few years, for the subset of images I had that fit within WebP's limitations (being the 16383×16383 dimensions and 32 bpp color depth). I've recently converted everything to JPEG XL. Old JPEGs
483.
by chungy 3y ago
It's worth remembering that Raku originated as "Perl 6" and a lot of design philosophies are derived from Perlisms in the first place. The author seems to be unfamiliar with both Perl and Raku's history, given that he im
484.
by chungy 3y ago
I've been pretty happy with it, myself. All the base OS libraries support JPEG XL so it's nearly pain-free, excepting lack of web browser support. Combined with GNU parallel, I did this: find -type f -iname \*.jpg -print0 |
485.
by chungy 3y ago
Dreadful where? In this day and age, WebP is supported by every browser, I can browse them comfortably in my file manager and basically every image-related program can open and edit them (I'm running GNOME on Arch). Where is it lacking
486.
by chungy 3y ago
JPEG2000 is a different format, just as JPEG XL isn't the same as original JPEG.
487.
by chungy 3y ago
It won well before GitHub. and I always liked it better than Mercurial too :)
488.
by chungy 3y ago
> > Fossil is a recent git alternative > It’s almost as old as git. Fossil has been around since 2006, while git was born in 2005. I'm assuming the author recently discovered fossil, but it is an absurd statement regardless :)
489.
by chungy 3y ago
You can also do C-x C-e in bash and it'll open your current prompt input in $EDITOR. You can even start doing multi-line input the easy way through this method.
490.
by chungy 3y ago
I must be in my wrong mind then. :) Just because it's a 128-bit number doesn't mean it should be difficult to remember, the standard notation goes a long way toward that. 2001:db8::cafe:f00d and fc00:bad:beef::1 aren't what I
491.
by chungy 3y ago
At least it still performs well at the "Home Depot stuff hauler" part. A sedan is absolutely impossible to work for that use case. (Ok: I'm a bit defensive. There's a concerted Internet effort over the past year to paint
492.
by chungy 3y ago
I could've sworn I tried and didn't get anything. Now it is working. I don't know what I did! (running version 2.22, at any rate)
493.
by chungy 3y ago
Where are you typing help to get that output?
494.
by chungy 3y ago
This is a great program and I use it almost every day. A+ For my local units file, I've also defined a “floppyMB” for retro computing purposes. The old “1.2 MB”, “1.44 MB”, “2.88 MB” measures were based on the idea that “1 MB = 1000 Ki
495.
by chungy 3y ago
Trying your examples, especially considering that the elliptical orbit of the earth likewise causes the Sun's angular diameter change depending on where our orbit is, I found that Units current has a buggy definition of moondist_min an
496.
by chungy 3y ago
Mozilla's made no such position as removing the experimental JPEG XL code.
497.
by chungy 3y ago
There is Ladybird.
498.
by chungy 3y ago
Give TeXmacs a shot.
499.
by chungy 3y ago
Perhaps they aren't. TeXmacs is also from the 1990s and from your brief description, no compelling reason was offered to prefer them. :p
500.
by chungy 3y ago
Can't say I've heard of those, but TeXmacs does pride itself on being structured.
501.
by chungy 3y ago
TeXmacs isn't a derivative of LaTeX. It has an unfortunate name. It is a WYSIWYG editor that produces comparable output. It does support some subset of (La)TeX backslash commands as convenience, but requires none of them. Basically you
502.
by chungy 3y ago
English rules for using "a" or "an" depend on sounds used in the next word, not particular letters. "A unit" and "An hour" are easy examples that might trip people up when focused on the letters used
503.
by chungy 3y ago
The disadvantage of Word is that it has absolutely terrible output and quite a lot of use cases are hard or impossible to use in it. Don't let the name fool you. TeXmacs won't make you write (La)TeX. You'll get tables that wo
504.
by chungy 3y ago
> I've started writing stuff with msword and I honestly like it better. Give TeXmacs a try. You don't need to suffer between Word and LaTeX :)
505.
by chungy 3y ago
Have you ever danced with the Devil in the pale moonlight?
506.
by chungy 3y ago
You could always use free format COBOL. https://gnucobol.sourceforge.io/faq/index.html#do-you-have-a...
507.
by chungy 3y ago
You're probably at a lower risk of being murdered with a bad cop than with your own family members.
508.
by chungy 3y ago
The good news is that Unicode has stayed out of politics. Such things you're complaining about are graphemes comprised of multiple combined code points, and it's up to an environment to support them or not (Android and iOS infamou
509.
by chungy 3y ago
I'll just say: consider yourself very lucky to not having encountered it. (Especially if you've spent any time downloading random zip archives from the internet...) I have quite a number of times. There's no one "thing&q
510.
by chungy 3y ago
The problem is that if the operating system allows sequences that are not valid UTF-16, then you cannot just state "it uses UTF-16": anything that is expecting UTF-16 and only UTF-16 is going to break on valid file names. "Th

More ›