christianmunoz

3 ms·

1.
by christianmunoz 8y ago
Links from the SEC website about this $5m loan: Promissory Note: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1040792/000121390018... 8-K Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d
2.
by christianmunoz 10y ago
I don't disagree that influencers exist on pretty much all large social networks nowadays, and that some people make a living off of this. I've seen it firsthand with people I know who do this, and it's not as far-fetched as
3.
by christianmunoz 10y ago
I'm curious on your intended or expected use cases?
4.
by christianmunoz 10y ago
After reading a little more, it looks like they're capping any video streams they can detect on their network at 1.5Mbps, and not attempting to re-encode anything.
5.
by christianmunoz 10y ago
I'm curious to know how they are planning on doing this from a technical standpoint. I can understand them throttling video streaming for their own services (such as the U-Verse app), but to do it for other services? I also can't
6.
AT&T to throttle your video quality in the name of 'data saving'(cnet.com)
5 points by christianmunoz 10y ago|5 comments
7.
by christianmunoz 10y ago
Copied this from another comment of mine on this post, but it answers part of your question. From the FCC fact sheet[0] on the decision: > The Order prohibits “take-it-or-leave-it” offers, meaning that an ISP can’t refuse to serve custom
8.
by christianmunoz 10y ago
I was able to find an answer to at least part of this question in the FCC fact sheet[0] on the decision. > The Order prohibits “take-it-or-leave-it” offers, meaning that an ISP can’t refuse to serve customers who don’t consent to the use