Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chrismeyer_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
fixed. thanks
2.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
clickable http://jerknessreminder.com
3.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
The whole logic is flawed for these reasons : 1) He was able to build a product that sold for 34k bucks in a year in 1990, at that time the software market wasn't nearly as saturated as it is today. 2) It won't simply be possible today, wit
4.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
Thanks for the great suggestions. I have already changed the site according to your advice. Regarding the other suggested models, yes, i have considered SMS and i will probably include it. The other sites part of the network will be less se
5.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
Of images hosted on wikimedia or freely usable obviously. There are a couple but we are not sure.
6.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
clickable http://failreminder.com
7.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
Yes you are right. I am thinking about changing that image. Do you have any suggestion aka link ?
8.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
Why do you think that's the easiest to attack? i think your point is wrong. i acknowledge that i plainly copied the design but that's not an important issue. Their site design is not one of their weaknesses.
9.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
Deeply different, it leverages on awesomenessreminders.com weakness, it becomes easily boring. Our message will be different every time, and not only in the way we present it to you, but also in its content.
10.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
done. what you think, looking better now ?
11.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
You are right. Let's change that. and thanks for the head up
12.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
clickable http://failreminder.com
13.
▲
Failreminder.com, just launched, any feedback?
3 points
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
|
8 comments
14.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
It allows sophisticated checks of your web cache or history, both flavors are available. Thus it renders your privacy an abstract concept. Nowadays by using facebook, you are doing something very similar. From this point of view i can under
15.
▲
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
Not for all elements, but even if they say that is not going to create issues, i am already noticing styling troubles here and there on the web. This is not a good practice. The CSS history leakage problem is not so serious. Much worse are
16.
▲
Ask HN : Chrome 6 and 7 getComputedStyle(el,prop) is lying, did anyone notice?
1 points
by
chrismeyer_
16y ago
|
2 comments