chrisjj

16 ms·

391.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> In any code or structured output, there just isn’t the flexibility Variable name perversion incoming...
392.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> the only acceptable answer for why an LLM should choose bananas instead of pineapple (or coconut, or guava, or papaya...) is that it has determined that it’s the best fit for the intended meaning, tone, and sentiment of the text. It al
393.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
The update is awaiting PR dept approval.
394.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Someone unlocked this story for you. Log in to read for free.
395.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
How would the human ever know the so-called AI was keeping him/her in the loop for the important decisions?
396.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Plastic-free teabags are a thing e.g. https://www.hampsteadtea.com/
397.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
I've seen no example of emergent behaviour dominatimg LLM output.
398.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Indeed. The child applied intelligence. The LLM has none, so it relies upon regurgitating what it's ingested, and unsurisingly that includes very little programming Q&A with young children. It has no record of not knowing the answ
399.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
It confirms what we knew. The stochastic parrot regurgitates what it was fed. There's no intelligence.
400.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Emergent behavior exists and at this point dominates LLM behavior. Better to say emergent behavior exists and at this point dominates gulled LLM users' behavior. LLM output is not emergent behaviour. Its simply word prediction wit
401.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> still keeping a real human in the loop for the important decisions. How would the human ever know that, though?
402.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> never the bagged product, as the latter infuses microplastics. Seriously? How can a paper tea bag infuse microplastics?
403.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> We can build something which has all the output associated with reasoning. Sure. A photocopier fed with a maths paper.
404.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Flip a coin.
405.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> more often than not it will just make a decision and it's often the wrong one. Let's not forget these chatbots rely on a random number generator to pick output options.
406.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Yes, but still someone/thing real has to be trusted to ID the human initially.
407.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Has this yet produced a treatment for AI psychosis? No? Well fancy that! :)
408.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Now working. Thanks.
409.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
It is wasted if its reduction is less than that of alternative uses for that instruction space.
410.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
... and currently nonresponsive.
411.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
"Not predictable" is cope for the true failing. "AI" is not reliable . As for the purported upside of the random variability in output... seriously? Who would want an RNG in a C compiler's code generator. Or worse
412.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Unfortunately so. Any solution would rely on trust and for that reason alone would be unworkable.
413.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
For the 0yr-old to keep private?
414.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
We just need untheivable unlosable numbers /i
415.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> It is not exactly hard for an illicit entity to just put some random ID numbers it bought off the dark web on its books. And now you have just made it even harder for the people who had their identities stolen to clear themselves. The
416.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
"Error establishing a database connection"
417.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Great! I vote for a skin tension control.
418.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Model collapse due to ingesting its own slop?
419.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> I really wish these agents attem[pted less personality and were more mechanical. Which will sooner convince the gullible of "AGI"?
420.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Did I miss "We share your PPI with 1786 partners" ?

More ›