chrisjj

14 ms·

421.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
No change from regular chatbot coding, then.
422.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Computer History supplies recent activity as context. Burning tokens, right?
423.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
In the UK, presenting a ticket to a humam often leads to this for them to scroll it. First ensuring the QR code is visible does not always suffice.
424.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
How so? You cannot engage the mode once child has phone.
425.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> This means it would be more easily abused if you're using biometric unlocks, yes, but by no means does it make the feature useless. And it normalizes a level of trust between individuals which is appropriate, but impossible, in ma
426.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Ah. The medical meaning, for an analogy. I think 99% of readers will, like me, take the software meaning. I'm sure Claude would know that if left to its own knowledge base, so I presume it was prompted to go way outside its training,
427.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> ... I tested both and shipped the one that read better And there we have it. "AI"s prime use case. Best instead of good enough.
428.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Is Claude really this bad, though? E.g. "The problem that never went away was async. Every framework, including ours, treated it as a condition that happened to it." Async treated as a condition ? And a condition happens ? And o
429.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> By not taking photos of it... That's not occlusion.
430.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> The One Person Framework AI ate your hyphen?
431.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
The path to left and right is occluded? By what?
432.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Better? A turn on the spot shows a wreck everywhere but forward.
433.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
How many benchmarks did they have to reject in the search for one that scores them top?
434.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Vector graphics actually require a lot of work from the models How so? Surely they can just steal such generic graphics off existing web sites.
435.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Pure vibe-sciencing.
436.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> we tested 7 models from Anthropic, OpenAI and Kimi, and found that they're all able to computationally discover new materials More "AI" PR bullsh*t. All they do is suggest new materials.
437.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> So the sandbox does not actually suspend a live interpreter. It is stateless. It fakes a continuation by re-executing the whole block from scratch with previously recorded results substituted in Stateless? How is the recorded results n
438.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Is the additional explicit reference to CSAM necessary to ... There's no such reference. There's only a reference to the far broader "sexual content of a minor".
439.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
So, there's a genuine image and an "AI" fake, both signed. Seriously how do you think an authority is going to resolve that?
440.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
Creations often emerge after the creator deaths - fake or genuine.
441.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
> If your argument is that images can't be verified, you are going to need to provide some kind of backing to that. I've seen no credible verification method. If you have, then you are the one that needs to provide backing.
442.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
> I have already said, it's done by establishing trust by tying identity to images. You've said it, but you've not credibly substantiated it. Imagine a famous photo journalist dies and there emerge "AI" fake pics
443.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
Its precisely what it appears to be. Self-promotiom.
444.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
> I guess I'm too self-aware The word you're looking for is self-respecting :)
445.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
> You also don't seem to understand the point of the signature. It's not to prevent fake images, it's to tie an identity to images so that that trust can be established and permanently lost in the case of a malicious actor
446.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
True title: Why Dropbox is a obvious PE Target
447.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
> Public reports bad actors to the signing authority. Public would know the pics were fake let alone know who to report. > They and/or independent firms investigate. What's to investigate? You have a fake pic that is indisti
448.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
Or fare dodgers. Of which there are many thanks to the chocolate teapot of ticket security e.g. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/tfl-fare-dodger-caught-using-08360...
449.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
> What would be the failure case for the trial? Every passenger taking the "nope" lane.
450.
by chrisjj 3mo ago
You'd be charged under the Computer Misuse act. /i

More ›