chrisjj

10 ms·

271.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
I'd say what author means is the standard solution - which is equivalent to his on triangles but is on pixels ... except there's nothing naive about it and by using GPU parallelism and depth hardware it is lower cost on dense mesh
272.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Do remember Claude is not try to mean anything. It is extruding a mash-up of the web slop on which it was fed.
273.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Because these modeks have no latent space. They work by tokens and nothing else.
274.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> as these models get better at working they get worse at communication. There is no working other than communication. They are just text generators.
275.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> "duplicate” does not mean the same thing Oh no. Claude slurped meta Stack Overflow!
276.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Mad cow disease comes to my mind.
277.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> You need sovereignty. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
278.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> “For many tasks, we could say that we have already achieved AGI. Author needs child's dictionary explaining general .
279.
Three UK airports hit by cyber-attack with data of 8.7M customers accessed(theguardian.com)
6 points by chrisjj 2mo ago|0 comments
280.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Hilarious! Thanks.
281.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
True title: Product Development is Dead
282.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> The company said the incident was “the first known case of an automated agent collective acting offensively without authorisation” "without authorisation"? What is this bs? Is every ChatGPT response "without authorisatio
283.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Different. You have a wide choice of good human developers.
284.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Those aren't poisoners. The are attempted protectors.
285.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
That kinda presumes you get good results. All you're sure to get is a bigger bill for tokens.
286.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
And the bot will dump on us another decade's worth - just 10x quicker.
287.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Eventual shortcomings will be fixed not by looking into the code, but by typing in another prompt, asking another agent. So, you'll rely on the tech that created buggy code to somehow suddenly create bug-free code?
288.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> who cares how was it written. Everyone who wants it to work properly.
289.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
OK, but any reliance on a fakable signal such as this seems guarateed to invite poisoning.
290.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> And the consequences become particularly serious when something happens that the machine can't solve Sadly the bot-gulled will always say "But the next model will be good enough to do that!".
291.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Well done! Looking forward to your next.
292.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Clickbait title for a story about a bot translating a program from one language to another. Some people get hyped over the most trivial things.
293.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> it makes preparing training material for Machine Learning significantly easier How?
294.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Journalism will rely on a person vouching for their images with their reputation Their images? I don't know how they'll be able to prove that.
295.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> There is no clear intent of “opening up competition and choice” hidden in the murky, impenetrable prose of the DMA. You expected clear and hidden?
296.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> In brief, we’re seeking evaluations that: > ... >* Test both precautions and harms (i.e., evaluate the risk of both overcompliance and overrefusal); So, no overuse, overreliance etc. Why are we not surprised.
297.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Surely some are both?
298.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Eligible music must also be produced using legal AI services. Oops.
299.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Love the em dashes!
300.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
I agree.

More ›