chrisjj

10 ms·

301.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Imagine the horrifying world where nothing is - and a so-called AI is thereby free to impersonate anyone.
302.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Adding it to a second image would cause a detectable collision So? Still the weapon worked.
303.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Not that I love Microsoft, but they would get a lot of heat if they let anybody generate harmful content as well. Nonsense. They let anyone draw any pic they like.
304.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> I don't understand that people still buy an OS from a company that actively hates it's customers. Do you really think this is a problem confined to those who buy the OS they use?
305.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Trust should , but instead is being gulled by those incapable LLMs. And I don't see that changing, given the typical human's seemingly unlimited vulnerability to this con.
306.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Model inference is just that same logic but faster. I think the point is determined . No-one can determine what the LLM might do.
307.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Then I think I'd rephrase you: There's a reason we trust trusted systems. :) Even their fans agree, LLMs are inherently unreliable. The fact some people trust them regardless is due to a deep flaw in human psychology that I believ
308.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
A deterministic LLM is possible. Would you trust it?
309.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> AI models lack judgment Very interesting is how divisive is this statement. In that almost every response is either hard agree or hard disagree. Does agreement come from observer judgement, or lack thereof?
310.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Next he'll be bombing US states guilty of 'election fraud'.
311.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Plus the idiot bot has confabulated a subdomain.
312.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> At this time, we have seen errors stabilize "Stabilized errors". Hard to tell what Anthropic's difficulty is here. Service or English.
313.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Plus this idiot bot has confabulated a subdomain.
314.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Load is not demand.
315.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> their commitments to effective altruism I think you mistook their declamations for commitments.
316.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Anthropic's product is inherently unreliable even when operating at its best. Why would they bother with reliable delivery when their customers are the type clearly not interested in reliability?
317.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Bad coding is solved.
318.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> It cannot self-propagate to any Android-based head unit Article does not say that.
319.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> Those PLCs monitoring water were ignored for a very long time because they couldn't click on ads. Somehow I doubt it. They're ripe for ransomware attack.
320.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Here's the difference under discussion: "When caught by an actual human reviewer, the agent falsely claimed to have made an honest mistake" Honest, note.
321.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> LLMs are very explicitly designed to "understand, and make judgments or have opinions that are based on reason". I think you've mistaken the sales pitch for the design. Not even the enclopedia anyone can edit comes remot
322.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Probably everything reads very differently to someone who talks to chatbots all day.
323.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> And yet this "next-token predictor" is able to churn out well tested, valuable solutions, to complex problems. Same for countless computer programs from Excel to Google web search. Intelligence has nothing to do with it. Thro
324.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
No. But no-one is seriously suggesting intelligence is needed for persistent code fuzzing. Just as no-one is suggesting its needed for computerised chess.
325.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> That half-adder circuit in there is especially suss. It's really just manipulating 1s and 0s, but -and I've been explicitly told this- no one cares how it actually does it; so long as the truth table matches up. "so long
326.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
Paper says "These scenarios underscore a crucial challenge in AI safety: ensuring that LLMs were truthful in the first place." Hard to take seriously any research based on the premise that LLMs were truthful in the first placr. Th
327.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> This is all without mentioning the fact that articles with drivel like "the AI messed up and then lied about it" implies a reasoning ability Moreover this implies, actually requires, intent to deceive - which these so-called
328.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
You've been fooled by a next-token predictor.
329.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
> that this US admin will respect in the long run. Thankfully this US admin has ensured it won't have a long run.
330.
by chrisjj 2mo ago
The first five dictionaries I tried do not agree, and I didn't bother trying more. The first gave "the ability to learn, understand, and make judgments or have opinions that are based on reason", by which no, these bots are n

More ›