chrisjc

53 ms·

1. 541.▲
   by chrisjc 7y ago

   Fortunately they are very understanding...
2. 542.▲
   by chrisjc 7y ago

   Sometimes it's just circumstance and timing... There were good intentions around what happened.
3. 543.▲
   by chrisjc 7y ago

   25% here, plus taken on 2-3x workload (not related to the furlough situation). Edit... btw, 2-3x workload doesn't mean that i can actually complete 2-3x workload.
4. 544.▲
   by chrisjc 7y ago

   I think his question is why is CLJS an incomplete lisp-on-js solution? Not why you don't like or use it.
5. 545.▲
   by chrisjc 7y ago

   Perhaps this video will answer your question. I was also shocked to learn this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQHFQoFoxvQ
6. 546.▲
   by chrisjc 7y ago

   https://docs.confluent.io/current/connect/kafka-connect-gcs/... > You can use this connector for a 30-day trial period without a license key. Ugh, you're right...
7. 547.▲
   by chrisjc 7y ago

   Yup, there was definitely a reason to consider Secor before 2017. Part of the reason I'm familiar with Secor in the first place. Just to be clear, there are dozens of Kafka Connect Sinks and Sources, and finding Kafka Connect Sinks for
8. 548.▲
   by chrisjc 7y ago

   Not sure if you're being factitious, but it sounded like parent's data was already in Kafka. But you're right, no reason not to start with kinesis in the first place, especially with all the AWS options around it including Ki
9. 549.▲
   by chrisjc 7y ago

   I've been following this project for a long time, but I have to ask what are the advantages over using Kafka Connect Sinks? https://docs.confluent.io/current/connect/kafka-connect-s3/i...
10. 550.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    No. If you want to use Firehose, you need to transfer data from Kafka to Kinesis first. You can probably use one of many Kafka Connect Sinks for this. Eg: https://github.com/awslabs/kinesis-kafka-connector At that poin
11. 551.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    > A practical example that solves a simple case is the recent release of a tool by Netflix. Which tool is this?
12. 552.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Agree with you completely, but how can we regulate domestically and expect companies to survive when the external competition doesn't have to abide by the same kinds of regulations. Edit: the obvious answer is tariffs, etc... but we ha
13. 553.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Details? Tips? How did it go?
14. 554.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Off-topic, but my podcast list has been so enriched through reading HN comment. Thanks for the link.
15. 555.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    I can't imagine what you're going through, but i would suggest taking a more positive outlook on the "ghosting". Some of these companies are going through some significant challenges, and priorities and attention may hav
16. 556.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Apparently this can be done in a brick-and-mortar (Home Depot, Pavillions, so on) too. And I mean even without ID, members card, ewallet, etc... There's nothing Mozilla can do about that too.
17. 557.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Or you know... Feb 29th, every four years.
18. 558.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Definitely an advantage on the other side of your traditional "CRUD" application... The data warehouse and BI stack.
19. 559.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Thank you for the correction. Sounds like a very slick solution bringing batch and streaming (the B and EAM obviously) together.
20. 560.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    It's been a while since I've used Redshift, but isn't it still dependent on data coming in via a COPY from S3? Any sort of Redshift materialized view offering would depend on batches of data landing in an underlying table or
21. 561.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    I'm unfamiliar with BQ, but from what I understand BQ doesn't have any concept of streams... with maybe an exception for change-streams (change tracking) and that's very different and less powerful than what Materialize is ab
22. 562.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Thanks for the detailed response. At this point i think the onus is on me to go and take a deeper look into timely/differential. Important "sources" to me are obviously Kafka, but also MySQL and Mongo. Important "sinks&q
23. 563.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Would it be fair to say this is a more OLAP-oriented approach to what KSqlDB (not KSql, but https://ksqldb.io/ ) does? Seems that it's perhaps lacking the richness of how ksqldb uses Kafka Connectors (sinks and sources)
24. 564.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    I recall that the last landing had an unusually hard touchdown. https://youtu.be/1KmBDCiL7MU?t=1188
25. 565.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Aren't most of the other 5G infrastructure manufactures European (Siemens, Nokia)? Do the US carriers really care where their equipment comes from? Handset manufactures probably don't care since they're sourcing from others.
26. 566.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    So you're saying that we shouldn't feel sorry for these 20th/21st century companies because of what happened in the 18th and 19th centuries? The whataboutisms are nauseating. > Pretending this is somehow how China specific
27. 567.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    > These American companies thought they could build their products for a fraction of the price in China and increase margins. Perhaps a bit of an over generalization. Some were interested in licensing technology to Huawei as was the case
28. 568.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Same. Would love some pics or some advice about what you've done to make this a place that is conducive to getting work done.
29. 569.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Wait a second... You mean Opera got in trouble for facilitating such activity through predatory lending web-sites it renders, or that Opera the browser company got in trouble for predatory lending? edit: i guess i should have read the whole
30. 570.▲
    by chrisjc 7y ago

    Data Warehouses are (usually) not optimized for individual inserts, updates, deletes (DMLs). Loading data into DWHs is usually done through copy/ingestion commands where aggregated/batched data is copied from blob storage (s3, azu