Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chrisfosterelli
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
1y ago
This is hacker news. Hacker ethos is rooted in the intellectual challenge of overcoming software systems and electronic hardware. It's the same ethos that stole long distance phone minutes, traded warez, and got free satellite channels
62.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
1y ago
I think its worth noting the study did not actually make this claim, the news article did. I suspect the study authors would agree the term "language brain" or "math brain" is misleading.
63.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
1y ago
For that <1% left as carbon, comes >75% released as carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, which needs to be recaptured. Tree capture by itself is already too inefficient -- you need to cover roughly the entire area of new mexico with tr
64.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
1y ago
Agreed, "all" is an unfair word. Thanks. It's more accurate to say the majority of it is returned to the atmosphere. Less than 1% of burned fuel typically becomes organic carbon, but also not all of the biomass exposed will a
65.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
1y ago
A common structure would be something like: * Class A - voting shares, founders / controlling parties, etc. Typically small fixed share count (e.g. 100), not issued dividends directly but used to represent percent of controlling intere
66.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
1y ago
It takes a long time to reach that equilibrium and something can disrupt it along the way. Inevitably what happens is, as the amount of dead wood increases, so does the fire risk, and when it burns its all returned to the atmosphere. This i
67.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
1y ago
Not every company is a unicorn. For bootstrapped companies that might never sell, multiple classes of stock can be extremely useful for a variety of legitimate accounting and dividend purposes. One of the local law firm's company setup
68.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
> The only thing that we seem to agree on, is that any sort of beverage containing sucrose is bad for you. Oooh, I guess I get to throw the wrench in that one. Endurance athletes benefit from the intake of large amounts of sugars during
69.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
I agree. It should seem obvious that chain-of-thought does not actually represent a model's "thinking" when you look at it as an implementation detail, but given the misleading UX used for "thinking" it also shouldn
70.
▲
Styled-components as a project is in "maintenance mode"
(opencollective.com)
2 points
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
|
0 comments
71.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
Let's please avoid ad hominem here. I don't think that's contributing to the discussion in the spirit of HN.
72.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
I think you could make a reasonable argument that their actions aren't actually effective at implementing their mission. I'm not really in a position to judge that, personally. I was just saying I don't think it requires any
73.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
I'm just an outsider here but it seems very obvious to me that someone could both 1) support the (stated) mission of saving taxpayers' money and reducing the US national debt, and 2) disagree with a specific cut
74.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
I'm sometimes stressed about something stupid and come here out of muscle memory; just trying to fill my brain with another thing for at least a few minutes. Every now and again there's a post like this one that reminds me the thi
75.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
This sounds like something that works until it doesn't, and then you have this massive codebase you're responsible for that doesn't work, and you don't understand why or know whether it can even be fixed.
76.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
I think you misunderstood me to be talking about just the politicians. Mark is claiming the gov is going to limit new entrants and give an effective monopoly to the large, established entities with political power. When the US applied arms
77.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
AI promises a lot of creative destruction. There are a plethora of historical examples where elites have restricted technological development because they thought it was a threat to the status quo and therefore their ability to extract weal
78.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
Ha, thanks! I was wondering where that post had gone as it wasn't showing in my replies. I imagine it was a confusing statement on a post about yahoo pipes.
79.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
You can get a massive amount of money with the stock market plugin once you get the cryptocurrency and leverage upgrades.
80.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
This made me think "wow, maybe the universe isn't so big after all", and then I remembered there are somewhere between 200 billion and 2 trillion other galaxies out there.
81.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
Why can't we just `await` the lock call? Edit: Nevermind, release of the lock is automatic when the callback resolves its promise. I get it now.
82.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
Changelog had a podcast come out with David Hansson (the creator of Rails) a few days ago: "Rails is having a moment (again)" https://changelog.com/podcast/615 I'm not a particular fan of Ruby itself but
83.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
I imagine that Open AI (the company) must really not like this.
84.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
I think you both are right in a way and what is maybe relevant is the duration. If someone lives full time permanently in another country working remotely, they probably are already actually a tax resident of that country and would typicall
85.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
> I’ve always wondered why countries care about this. If I’m employed in my home country, earning money there and paying taxes, what difference does it make if I happen to sit in another country? Based on the practical enforcement I get
86.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
> with perhaps the strongest argument being jurisdiction. What gives "home country" the legal right to claim taxes on income earned in "sitting country"? Usually a treaty. At least here in Canada the government has ta
87.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
By easier I was referring to intensity, rather than the experience of your ligaments. Presumably now that you've gotten into powerlifting you don't still lift the same weight you did when you started. If you did, it would indeed b
88.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
Thanks, this is what I was trying to articulate with my original comment. I've never heard of a runner who gets a little faster and decides "oh ok, I'll just take it easier now". You don't get fitter by training wit
89.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
The majority of people who run do not set their intensity by measuring the weight on their knees. If you take someone with a fixed fitness and reduce their mass, they will expend less energy per unit of time, but in order to effectively tra
90.
▲
by
chrisfosterelli
2y ago
Yes, I agree. I mentally consider "running" to include "walking, if that's the speed you should be at for your target intensity". I do a lot of walking on my runs even still :)
More ›